Surely the first of many more to come.
This is sharia law, Folks. The penalty is death for adultery-just as it is for blasphemy against Islam, apostasy from Islam and homosexuality. Yet, apologists in the US and Europe keep telling us sharia will rule one day in our countries. "Nothing to fear", they will tell you. "It is perfectly compatible with the US Constitution and our Bill of Rights". I have attended two public events on the issue, and I have heard the promises and the lies myself.
http://news.yahoo.com/jihadists-stone-syria-woman-death-adultery-ngo-142139634.html;_ylt=A7x9UkgYP8pTNxEAqpV3Bwx.;_ylu=X3oDMTByNGxmazk4BHNlYwNzcgRwb3MDMQRjb2xvA2lyZAR2dGlkAw--?.tsrc=samsungwn
Human rights? You think this is human rights? Do you think so-called honor killings are human rights? In Europe, Canada and right here in the US, we have had honor killings committed by families against their own wives and daughters-not by stoning-that would be pretty hard to carry out doors in a country where it is simply considered murder- but behind closed doors, usually with knives.
You may not be interested in what happens in places like Iraq, Syria, Somalia, or Afghanistan, but you should. Some of the men carrying out these horrors are residents of our countries who have gone off to fight the jihad and will be bringing it back home.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
What a serial back of mendacity:
This is sharia law, Folks.
Adherents of dozens of other interpretations of Sharia would beg to differ. They don't rule the territory ISIS has seized, and ISIS doesn't rule them.
Yet, apologists in the US and Europe keep telling us sharia will rule one day in our countries.
Who, aside from open adherents of ISIS or similar aspirants to the defunct caliphate, say anything of the kind?
"Nothing to fear", they will tell you. "It is perfectly compatible with the US Constitution and our Bill of Rights".
Those who say that, expect to be able to live by Sharia in a manner that IS compatible. Those who believe in an incompatible interpretation of Sharia don't say that at all.
Bottom line: Gary wants all one billion Muslims in the world to be lined up as our enemies. Thus, he tells us that whatever al-Baghdadi says, that is what ANY and EVERY Muslim stands for.
And then Gary piously denies saying any such thing. When Gary rules the world, there will be a
Theresienstadt for good Muslims.
Oh, as for ISIS, the quickest way we can find to kill them all, without embroiling ourselves in the kind of quagmire where they kill us faster than we kill them, the better. Most of the world's Muslims will breath a sigh of relief when they are dead or dispersed.
How are we gonna do that, Siarlys? Maybe we can use some of that spectral dust that quack professor Jeff Halper thinks the Israelis have.
Siarlys,
You need to research Hudud sharia, Crimes against God. You will find it there.
The head of CAIR in SF personally told me and an audience at UCI last year that adultery was punished by death by stoning. It is affirmed by virtually every leading Islamic school of thought.
As I have posted before, I have sat and listened to leading Islamic imams in the US like Muzammil Siddiqi and others tell audiences that sharia is compatible with the US Constitution.
Siarlys, I have done my homework over the years. You have not. You simply sit back and kibbitz.
I don't need to do any more homework Gary. I have read widely on the subject, while you have read a few incomplete works by uneducated hacks that reinforce your own prejudices.
How are we going to kill all of ISIS? You don't have a solution, neither does John McCain, so why do you expect me to come up with one.
Referencing Hudud Sharia is rather like saying "Christians burn witches at the stake and burn Jews to death in their homes." Have such things happened? Certainly. Are they typical or fundamental? Only to those who perpetrate them.
If this is Sharia law, then burning witches and heretics is the Beatitudes.
Post a Comment