Sunday, July 5, 2020

Is the Netherlands Raising the White Flag?

Hat tip Dagelijkse Standaard. Translation by Fousesquawk.

"It's no use, Geert. Let's go have a beer."

Here is the latest depressing news out of the Netherlands, where the Parliament has been advised in a report that there is nothing to be done about the immigration mess because it's just too expensive.

Refugee Commission advice on immigration policy: "Nothing can be done, and it is much too expensive"!
-Wout Willemsen, 5 July 2020

Can anything be done with the immigration policy? The answer to the question is to be found in the advice that was sent July 3 from the ministry to the Second Chamber (Parliament), and is written in response to the investigation into the revision of the UN refugee treaty. July 3 is the day the summer recess  begins....Not so surprising because the conclusions are sad: "We can't do anything, or it is too expensive."

Dr Jan van de Beek has a nice Twitter thread set up where he manages to expose the core of the document (and its problems).

Tweet: (Inset)

1/6. It is noteworthy that this investigation into the revision of the UN refugee treaty, announced in the 2017 coalition agreement, will be sent to the Second Chamber on July 3- the day the summer recess begins

In the document, numerous fallacies are found, mixed with half-truths. The conclusions drawn are the following: "To adjust immigration policy costs a lot of money and is not worth it. Adjusting the UN refugee treaty costs too much (diplomatic) effort, so you also should not want to. And actually, we are all delivered to our fate, and migration is a kind of natural force that we can't do anything against."

This is outright nonsense, naturally, but the idea of border controls is bombarded with images of North Korea, military zones, and the Iron Curtain. And later, there is suddenly talk as if it will now be "permanently closed borders". It makes no sense, of course, but the message is clear: Very scary! So we have to continue to try to make agreements with untrustworthy countries then everything will be fine (perhaps, over time).

The cabinet will not do anything about it and also doesn't want to do anything. They just follow this advice. It is so simple.

Fousesquawk comment: How expensive are the Dutch lives that are being lost to these migrants? How expensive was the massacre at the Utrecht tram stop? How expensive are the murderous Moroccan gangs? How expensive was the life of Theo van Gogh? How expensive is it to protect Geert Wilders from jihadists? How expensive is it to monitor and combat radicalism in the Dutch mosques? How expensive is it to protect your Jewish citizens from Muslim thugs?

"Migration is a natural force"? No, legal and controlled immigration is a natural force, but countries can regulate it and enforce their borders so as to allow good people in and keep bad ones out.

Only if they have the will.

Cleveland Must Save the Indians!

It looks like the Cleveland Indians are going to finally bow to political correctness and are considering changing their name. Not that the word, "Indian", in itself is racist; it is a misnomer that goes all the way back in history to Adolf Hitler's,great-great-great-great grandfather, Christopher Columbus.  But it is that logo that really has people riled up.

But what about the tradition? It's a name that goes back over 100 years! Besides, when I was 12 years old, I pitched my team (the Indians) to our little league championship, red t-shirts and all.

There must be a solution......... I got it!

Now we just gotta do something about Cleveland.

Saturday, July 4, 2020

Happy Independence Day

Wishing all my friends a happy 4th of July.

Long live our great country, long may our flag wave.

And may all those who are trying to tear our country down get testicular cancer!

Stanford Dean of Students Quotes Cop-Killer/Fugitive, Joanne Chesimard

Hat tip The College Fix, Stanford Review and Breitbart

Mona Hicks

“This loving refrain from Assata Shakur still rings true as I shelter-in-place: ‘It is our duty to fight for our freedom. It is our duty to win. We must love and support each other. We have nothing to lose but our chains,'” the memo continued.
-Mona Hicks, Stanford Dean of Students

Last week, the Stanford Daily, one of Stanford University's student-run campus newspapers, refused to print an op-ed by the president of the Stanford College Republicans, Stephen Sills, in which he criticized a June 1 e-mail to the campus community by Dean of Students, Mona Hicks, in which she quoted Joanne Chesimard, aka Assata Shakur. Chesimard, who was convicted for her involvement in a 1970s  shootout in which a New Jersey police officer was killed, escaped from prison, and is now a fugitive in Cuba.

"I regret quoting Assata Shakur, without taking full consideration of her history."
-Mona Hicks

What exactly did Ms Hicks think she was quoting Chesimard for, her work with the Red Cross? You don't quote people like that unless you agree with their ideology. This woman should resign. She is not fit to occupy her position. Sadly, our universities are filled with others like her who are indoctrinating our children.

Where Are the Men in Germany?

Hat tip Gates of Vienna, Vlad Tepes and RAIR Foundation. Translation by Miss Piggy.

When I was a young soldier in Germany in the 1960s, and was full of piss and vinegar, I used to often see people getting pummeled on the street or in the train stations by German thugs. Being full of piss and vinegar, I interceded when I saw someone truly needed help. German guys tended to look the other way or just watch.

Apparently, things haven't changed much as this video from Berlin shows. In this incident, we see some migrant thug threatening a woman with her dog on the local suburban train (S-Bahn) as German guys basically act as potted plants.

In Europe, as in America, it seems we are facing a choice: Either we stand up and defend ourselves from the thugs taking over out societies or we perish. Personally, if a people are not willing to defend themselves, I question if they even deserve to survive.

Friday, July 3, 2020

Live at Mt Rushmore: Protesters Try to Stop Trump Speech

Hat tip Right Side and Vlad Tepes

"Throwing the Book at Them" in Sweden

Hat tip Pettersson's Blogg

One of the (many) problems the Swedish justice system has to deal with when it comes to crimes committed by immigrants from the Middle East and Africa is that since the true identities of these criminals is often not known, either is their age. The foreign criminal element in Europe has caught onto the fact that sentences for minors are significantly lower than adults, so many young men try to pass themselves off as being years younger than their actual age. With no documentary evidence, courts are reduced to conducting physical examinations to try and guess the age of the offender.

That brings us to yet another murder case in Sweden , this one committed by a Somali, who maintained he was 16 though it is  suspected he is older. Instead of being sentenced as an adult for stabbing a man to death (66 times), he was sentenced as a minor and thus, will serve 3 and a half years.

This below article from Pettersson's Blogg is translated by Fousesquawk.
-by Av Pettersson

Murder with 66 knife stabs and robbery brings 3.5 years juvenile custody for immigrant of unknown age

Crime. In December last year, a dead man, Rabeen Zuher Khalid, was found by passersby in Lövgärdet in Gothenburg. He was beaten and had been killed with 66 stabs in his head, throat and neck. Today, two young men were sentenced for the act. One for murder and robbery, the other for robbery and protecting a criminal, aggravated crime.

The younger of the two, Ayuub Mahamed Nur, citizen of Somalia and citizen of Sweden, and possibly 16 years of age at the time of the crime, was sentenced for murder and robbery to three and a half years juvenile custody. The prosecutor had claimed that he was older than he stated and that he was 18, not 16, when it happened. On this the district court wrote: "In light of the margin of error regarding the medical age investigation and what else has emerged, the district court considers that the age of 19 does not appear more likely than 17 years. The district court shall thus assume the age which is most favorable to NN, and in this context, i.e., 17 years."

In the investigation, a letter was found where Ayuub himself wrote that he would soon reach 19 years, yet he is sentenced as a 16-year-old at the time of the murder.


From Migration Court judgment UM 2437-13 dated 11 February 2014:

It is the asylum-seeker who must prove that he is a minor.

This principle also applies to unaccompanied children.

In the first place, written evidence is relevant.

However, the asylum-seekers has the burden of proof for his age and if he cannot prove that he is underage, he will be considered an adult.

The older of the two, Ibrahim Ali Mohamud, born 1999, and for some reason, a Swedish citizen, was sentenced to two years in prison for robbery and protection of a criminal,  aggravated crime.  He is freed of suspicion of murder.

Pettersson wonders why (the courts) don't follow the law when it regards age, it is the asylum-seeker who must prove his age and if he can't he is to be considered an adult and sentenced as an adult.

Guess Who Supports Israel in Germany-and Who Doesn't

Hat tip Gates of Vienna, RAIR Foundation and Vlad Tepes. Translation by Miss Piggy

Amid all the hullabaloo over Israel's considering annexing Judea and Samaria, only one political party in Germany supports such a move-Alternatif fuer Deutschland (Alternative for Germany), the conservative party that everybody else likes to call "racist", etc. because they oppose the growing Islamic presence in Germany, with all the intolerance and violence that it brings.  The other "moderate" parties are condemning Israel, no doubt bowing to their "Day of Rage" constituents.

Anton Friesen of AfD spoke on the floor of the Bundestag in support of Israel notwithstanding catcalls from the little brown shirts in the chamber.

Geert Wilders Defends Netherlands Against Racism Charge (Videos)

Hat tip Gates of Vienna and Vlad Tepes. Translation by Fousesquawk.

On July 1, the Dutch Parliament (2nd Chamber) held a debate on the topic of racism. Geert Wilders of the Party for Freedom (PVV)  defended the Netherlands against charges by other parliamentarians that the country was racist (against immigrants).

Here are two brief excerpts of Wilders' remarks with English sub-titles.

Thursday, July 2, 2020

Geert Wilders Defends the Netherlands Against Racism Charges

Hat tip Dagelijkse Standaard

Geert Wilders

In recent weeks, the Dutch Parliament has been debating the question of racism in the country. Geert Wilders, as is typical, eloquently defends his country against the charge.

Last night, I watched about an hour of the debate on television, and Wilders was brilliant.

The below article has two brief video excerpts from Wilders' talking points. We are working on getting those videos sub-titled to English.

Geert Wilders on racism: "80,000 social rental homes to asylum-seekers while native Dutch have to wait"
-By Bart Reijmerink, July 1, 2020

Geert Wilders cannot (tolerate)  that politicians believe that the Netherlands is racist to the bone. Asscher, in particular, must suffer in the debate on racism. The Netherlands is one of the most tolerant countries in Europe, so many provisions have been made for migrants, but it is still thought that the Netherlands is racist. Wilders can no longer (listen) to this nonsense, and he is ranting in the Chamber (Parliament).

In recent weeks, people have been throwing out terms like, "systemic racism". For Wilders this is incomprehensible because if the Netherlands was so institutionally racist, why then do we do so much for asylum-seekers in the Netherlands? According to Wilders, it is specifically the native Dutch who are discriminated against and not the foreigners. He gives the example of this of the foreigners should get priority in rental homes.

Wilders on Twitter:

"80,000 social rental homes went to asylum-seekers while natives on are a waiting list for years.

Don't make the racism problem bigger than it is. And think, finally, of all  the natives  who are discriminated against!"

Wilders also criticizes the fact that Lodewijk Asscher pictures the Netherlands as some kind of banana republic.  This is simply a big lie according to Wilders. The Netherlands is far away one of the most tolerant countries in Europe. If we look at our legislation, Wilders is certainly right. There are a number of countries who sometimes act like barbarians with migrants, or countries who maintain naturalization and integration policies that are many times stricter.

Wilders on Twitter:

"The Netherlands is one of the most tolerant lands in Europe, where racism is the least common."

"What Asscher outlines is an insult for all Dutch people."

The debate in the Second Chamber is rather black or white. Either you hear that the Netherlands is  racist through and through- filled with anecdotal evidence- or you hear that noting is wrong.

In other words, not a very constructive debate.

Big Demonstration for Trump-in Ottawa

Hat tip Vlad Tepes

-Vlad Tepes

On July 1, there was a big demonstration for President Trump in Ottawa, Canada of all places.  Naturally, the Canadian media handled it by resorting to fake news. Vlad Tepes has the details.

Wednesday, July 1, 2020

LA's "Day of Rage" Against Israel

As advertised, protesters demonstrated in front of the Israeli consulate in Los Angeles today over the consideration by the Israeli government to annexing the West Bank. It was boisterous, but thankfully, no violence. I am cross-posting the report from the LA Jewish Journal.

-Jewish Journal

Note the pro-Palestinian protester with the poster that reads, "Pigs are haram" (Arabic for forbidden). What did you expect?