"I think he's struggling to come up with some rationale why he's not talking....At some point we're going to find out, maybe by the end of the week, what he actually did that caused all of this trouble. He clearly did something wrong."
The tribunal at MSNBC has pretty much convicted Herman Cain. We already know what Ed "Butter and Egg Man" Schultz thinks. We know what Lawrence O'Donnell thinks. He's ready to put "his personal fortune" on the line to support the accusers if they will come forward and lay it out. And Chris Matthews? Here is what he told Matt Lauer on Wednesday:
(Media Research Center)
Keep in mind that we still don't know who the accusers are, and we still don't know what the specific allegations are.
Fair and balanced?
3 comments:
Everything I need to know about Herman Cain I learned when he first opened his mouth.
Siarlys,
Fine and dandy, but until the accusers have names and we know what the specific charges are, don't you think MSNBC has acted like a lynch mob (high tech lynch mob at that)?
More like irrelevant shouting session. It is simply not what is important about Herman Cain.
Post a Comment