Translate


Thursday, March 19, 2009

Nancy Pelosi Trashes ICE




On March 7, 2009, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi spoke in front of a mostly-Hispanic audience at St. Anthony's Church in the Mission District of San Francisco. The appearance was part of a nation-wide series of speeches entitled "Family Unity" tour organized by the leaders of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus. The principle organizer is Luis Gutierrez (D-Il), a man who has referred to government agencies, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and the Border Patrol, as "Gestapo". Pelosi, in her speech, not only pandered to the audience, but condemned the efforts of ICE to enforce our existing immigration laws. Her remarks were unworthy of a House Speaker when referring to federal law enforcement agencies.

Here are some of the quotes of statements made by Speaker Pelosi (which were recorded by a member of the audience unknown to Pelosi):

"Our future is about our children."

"Taking parents from their children...that's un-American."

"Who in this country would not want to change a policy of kicking in doors in the middle of the night and sending a parent away from their families?"

"It must be stopped...What value system is that? I think it's un-American. I think it's un-American."

"I can't say enough, the raids must end. The raids must end."

"You are special people. You're here on a Saturday night to take responsibility for our country's future. That makes you very, very patriotic."

First of all, we all know that Pelosi is an ultra-liberal politician from San Francisco, and nothing in this posting will cause outrage in her district. They have the representative that they want and deserve. But somewhere out there in the heartland of America, this must anger someone that the Speaker of the House of Representatives would make these statements about federal law enforcement authorities who are enforcing the law. Pelosi talks as if the Congress were holding hearings into police corruption as in the Knapp Commission hearings into New York City Police corruption decades ago.

That is certainly not the case here.

What about the accuracy of Pelosi's charges? Is it true that ICE is kicking down doors in the dead of night to capture one or two illegal aliens in a family? Although it has been alleged, my experience as a DEA agent (who also worked in a task force with US Immigration) tells me something different. Even 20-30 years ago, if Immigration got a tip that John Doe was an illegal alien and living at such and such an address, they would do nothing because they didn't have the resources to go after one or two persons at a time. That is ten times as true today. Doors being broken down in the dead of night sounds more like drug raids (when night-time warrant execution is authorized by a magistrate). Raids described by Pelosi sound more to me like raids on a business where ICE figures to round up dozens of illegal aliens or more during works hours. Could it be that some of these cases quoted by Pelosi and the open-borders crowd involve illegal aliens who are wanted on other criminal charges?

Similarly, what about about the charges of ICE agents dragging parents away from their children? ICE has already refuted those charges. They have taken great care to insure that when a parent is arrested, no child is left unattended. Is someone trying to use the example of Elian Gonzalez here, which was conducted by the Clinton Justice Department under Janet Reno? (I supported the action of the Justice Department in that case since I felt that Elian's father had every right to reclaim his son.)

Or maybe you would care to bring up the case of the Mexican woman in Chicago who was finally arrested in Los Angeles and sent back to Mexico a couple of years ago-leaving her young son in the care of US church officials, with whom she had enjoyed sanctuary? Let's be clear: If an illegal alien parent is subject to deportation, they have every right to take their entire family with them back to their home country-regardless of the citizenship status of the child. If they choose to leave them behind-for whatever reason-that is on them.

Our immigration and border officials are doing an impossible job-with precious little support from our government in Washington. Nancy Pelosi's outrageous comments underscore that point. Ms Pelosi should be ashamed of her comments and apologize to the men and women of ICE.

Who Dunnit?



Who put the line in the Stimulus Package that protected bonus payments agreed to before February 11, 2009?


"C'mon Dodd, Talk. We know you did it."

"No, I swear-I didn't do it!"

"Yes, you did."

"No I didn't"- Ok, Ok, I did it, but they made me do it."

"Who's they?"

"......... I can't.....they'll......."

"Pick up Geithner and bring'em downtown."

Wednesday, March 18, 2009

Let's Play, "Name That Kid!"



Can you name the kid in the above photo?

a The Cisco Kid
b Doogie Howser MD
c A recent American Idol winner
d Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner (soon to be ex-Treasury Secretary)

If you guessed b-you are a winner!! If you guessed d-you are close.

Obama in Orange County-No Clue


"What do I do, Mr President?"


Driving home from work this afternoon, I caught parts of President Obama's town hall meeting in Orange County. While I missed parts of it, I did come away with a definite impression based on the parts I did hear.

The man has no clue.

First of all, it is undeniably true that once you take that telePrompter away from him, he is lost. The great oratorical skills vanish into thin air as he is reduced to a string of verbal tics and joking asides as he attempts to formulate an answer.

The first portion I heard was when someone asked him what he was going to do about immigration reform. Obama, realizing that his questioner was for a lenient policy, proceeded to wander through every talking point on both sides of the issue in an effort to please everybody. He wanted "comprehensive reform"-but not amnesty, mind you. He expressed concern about undocumented workers being exploited. He referred to a path to citizenship-again assuming they all want to be US citizens. He said they had to go back to the end of the line. They had to learn English. he's going to Mexico to meet with President Calderon, etc. etc....... Bottom line?

Hell if I know. However, if you read between the lines, don't look for this president to seal that border or put a stop to illegal immigration.

Then I heard the final question from a man who had lost his job (auto worker) and was unable to find another job because he had committed a felony 20 years ago.

"What do I do?" asked the man.

Unfortunately, he asked the wrong guy because Obama had no idea what to tell the man. As he began his long, tortured reply, Obama talked about how the man had obviously put his past mistakes behind him. He talked about the bad economy. He talked about the "programs" he wanted to initiate. He talked about the need to build environmentally friendly cars, solar energy, wind-something-or-others. He asked the man what company he had worked for, and the reply was "Toyota". (Too bad Obama couldn't mention any bailouts). Finally, the President wished the man well and said goodbye to the crowd.

"What do I do?"

President Obama must be thinking the same thing right about now.

Outrage Grows Over the Great Fousesquawk Bailout


(Tip of the hat to MattandPhilipsjokebook.com)


Congress reacted in fury today over reports that Fousesquawk, the blog giant, will be given another 150 billion dollars in tax-payer funds to cover bonus payments. This on top of the previous 150 billion, Fousesquawk had already received in TARP payments earlier this year.

Senator Chuck Grassley (R-IA) said that Fousesquawk CEO Gary Fouse should kill himself. Senator Chuck Schumer (D-NY) said that he and Senator Chris Dodd (D-CT)would introduce legislation to tax any bonuses paid out by Fousesquawk at 100%. Secretary of the Treaury Tim Geithner issued a statement today that he would personally meet with Fousesquawk this week as soon as he (Geithner) finished doing his income taxes on Turbo-Tax. President Obama was unavailable for comment as his TelePrompTer is down for repairs after the fiasco at yesterday's St Patrick's day party with the Irish Prime Minister when they were reading each other's speeches. (That's not a joke.)

Earlier this morning, reporters caught up with CEO Gary Fouse at his cubicle at UC Irvine where they asked him a series of questions.

When asked how many bonuses were involved, Fouse replied only one since he was the only executive. He denied that any bonus money would go to Lance and Bryan, his two chief co-respondents.

"They never agree with me on anything anyway", Fouse stated.

Fouse did, however, admit that a few billion would go to the Radarsite and Grizzly Groundswell blogs, which are Fousesquawk affiliates.

When asked about the critical statements made by members of Congress, Fouse grew defiant.

"Who are they to criticize me? Dodd? I own that bum. Check his contribution list and see how much money I've given him. Check out what Maxine Waters said about me a few years back on the floor of the House.....'Fousesquawk, under the OUTSTANDING leadership of Gary Fouse.......' And Barney Frank? He's complainin' now, but remember when he said the US couldn't afford to let a giant like Fousesquawk go under. Besides, Barney better watch his mouth. I know a few things."

Fouse grew evasive, however, when asked how much advertising revenue Fousesquawk brings in.

"Well, uh....I don't really know. I got this deal with Adsense, and last time I checked the account, they owed me about 55 bucks......, but ya see I don't get nothin' until it reaches a hundred bucks. Yeah, that's it! That's the ticket!"

Finally, when asked by reporters what he would say to the American tax-payers who are forking over all these billions, Fouse retorted,

"Suck it up."

Tuesday, March 17, 2009

Letter From a College Teacher to a Freshman




Being a political conservative who has been teaching on college campuses for almost 14 years, I have come to some reflections that I think should be shared with an incoming freshman (or woman) about to enter college. To me, the most important thing for an incoming college student is to obtain a quality education that prepares him/her to go out into the world and make a career and living. That also includes the ability to think about the issues of the day, form a belief system, and genuinely care about what is going on in our country and the world. Whether a young person becomes a liberal or conservative is beside the point. The important thing is to really think about issues and form one's own opinion based on considering all sides.

I was a college student during the 1960s and was exposed to a bit of opinions being propagated by professors in the classroom. I basically resented it-especially after I had served three years in the Army and obtained some real life experiences that enabled me to form some of my own views.

Today, as a teacher (English as a Second Language) at the University of California at Irvine, I have set my own rules for what I say in the classroom to my students, not because I fear retribution, rather because I consider it to be my personal professional code of conduct. First of all, my subject matter is the English language, and there is no real need to discuss hot topics in class-even in a speaking and listening class. Unfortunately, many of our textbooks have politically-correct texts in them-especially regarding the environment. In those cases, I tell the students that political opinions expressed in texts are just opinions, and they are free to agree or disagree. As for my opinions, my students have no idea what I think about various issues. If I am asked, I tell them that my opinions don't matter. What matters is their opinion. My only advice is to expose themselves to all sides of an argument and then decide what they think is right. What I am trying to say here is that I don't see it as my role to tell my students what to think about the world or counter the liberal bias that exists in so many college classrooms. I have expressed my views among my colleagues in the office as well as various campus forums outside of the classroom, which I feel is valid, but the classroom is off-limits as far as I am concerned.

So what do I say to a college freshman who is going to be exposed to a certain point of view in the classroom and on campus in general? Well, I would start by the old rule of critical thinking. First of all, what you read and what you hear spoken should be held up to one question: Is it fact or opinion? Is what you are reading designed to inform-or to persuade? There is an old saying; opinions are like noses-everybody has one (only we didn't say noses).

Another question the student must consider is whether they are being given both sides of an issue-and if not-why not? Are both sides being given fair consideration? If not, why not? After all, the very definition of a university is where all sides and arguments are presented-even if controversial. Just because it is considered controversial by some to criticize our country or our president doesn't mean it can't be just as controversial-on a college campus-to defend our country or our president. Ask yourself this question: Which is considered riskier on a college campus-to criticize George W Bush or to praise him? To condemn our actions in Iraq or defend them. To condemn Israel or defend her?

Students should also consider whether or not their university is really living up to its definition when certain points of view are considered unacceptable to express. For example, why should it be risky for a student to express support for the US including its policy in Iraq, the Bush Administration and Israel? Why is it that so few voices are heard expressing those sides of the whole Middle East issue? Why are people in college reluctant to oppose gay marriage or illegal immigration? Why is it that the entire debate is dominated by those who love to criticize our own country, our ex-president and the State of Israel? Why is it that those students and those faculty (and there are some faculty, believe it or not) choose to keep their opinions to themselves rather than risk ostracism, career damage and possibly even physical intimidation?

Also, why is it that leftists are so dominant on college campuses, and why is it that many of them insist on pushing their beliefs down the throats of their students? Why is it that some of them will berate a student in front of the class who dares to express a different opinion? Why is it that some of them will penalize a student's grade for expressing an opinion opposed to that of the professor?

That leads to the next question: Are opposing (conservative) points of view being suppressed in the classroom and on the campus by faculty/administrators? If so, why? Is it because the suppressed views are so inherently evil that they should not even receive a hearing? Or is it because it is feared that if the other points of view get a fair hearing in the free marketplace of ideas that they will prevail? I would submit that the side that suppresses is not the right side.

That leads to the next question a young student should consider: If one philosophy actively suppresses the other, which philosophy should be considered morally correct? For example, the next time you witness a protest rally, watch the level of respect one side shows for the other's right to express their point of view? Which side acts in a more obnoxious manner? Which side has to be restrained by police? Which side engages in violence? Which side's speakers express hatred for America? Now I realize there can be exceptions on both sides from incident to incident, but over time, I think you will see a pattern. Is it not legitimate if one side tends to act like thugs to conclude that their point of view may not be correct?

Of course, many young students know what is happening, but they say that there is campus peer pressure to conform to a certain point of view. They also reply that in a classroom, the professor is an authority figure who can easily win a debate with a student, make that student look foolish and even destroy the student's grade. Many professors are guilty of this, and it is hard to advise a student concerned about his or her grade how to handle it.

What is crucial here, however, is that the students have to recognize when they are being fed facts and when they are being fed opinions. They have to be able to separate education from indoctrination. They have to remain true to their own belief system, and if that is still evolving, they need to get all sides before deciding on their own which is right and which is wrong. Failure to do that will mean that they will graduate with a diploma and little else, for they will be little more than robots. And if that is the result, those students will be good for little more than becoming the next generation of college indoctrinators.

Our Government in Action-What We Can Expect


Government DMV



Government car




Government housing




Government health care




Government banks




Our Government

Washington' s "Outrage" Over AIG


Congress in session


Several years ago, I had an acquaintance who worked on the staff of Iowa Senator Charles Grassley back when he was serving his 43rd term in Congress. My friend used to do Grassley imitations which clearly made the point that the senator was a demanding loudmouth jerk. That all came back to me this morning in hearing about Grassley's latest ridiculous statement in Iowa City yesterday (wherever that is). Grassley, in reacting to the news that AIG had given 165 million dollars in bonuses to their executives-after receiving millions in government bailouts- stated that the Japanese would do the honorable thing and resign or commit suicide. Genius Grassley even added something about resigning after committing suicide. My question is this: How come none of the real architects of this mess (our political leaders) resign?

Let's take President Obama for example. Yesterday, he was telling a crowd how mad he was about the AIG bonuses. He then added that his trusty Treasury Secretary, Tim Geithner, was "on the job" trying to get the money back (probably going through the Turbo-Tax directions). Then he took care to add that current (and just installed) AIG President Edward Liddy had taken over after the bonuses had already been agreed to. Don't blame him, folks(must be a friendly Democrat).

As a matter of fact, AIG had reported to Congress a year ago that they had made contractual obligations to pay these bonuses-which just came due. In other words, our "outraged" leaders in Washington had known all along about these bonuses-even as they were handing out the money.

But here comes the real lollapaloosa. Senator Chris Dodd, who always seems to have a hand in these money deals, inserted language into the big Stimulus Package to the effect that contractual obligations made before February 11, 2009 would not be tinkered with. That includes the AIG bonus deal. Yet, Dodd is now speculating with reporters about finding a way to get that money back-possibly by placing huge taxes on the bonuses.

How disingenuous is that?

None of this is meant to excuse misbehavior on Wall Street. But it is highly ironic that the same people in Congress (like Barney Frank) who orchestrated poor financial practices with their Community Reinvestment Program are now screaming the loudest.

Maybe the honorable thing to do would be for our entire Congress to resign

.....but please don't commit suicide.

Monday, March 16, 2009

UC Santa Cruz-America's Wackiest University?


UC Santa Cruz Banana Slugs-an Appropriate Mascot


Being a part-time teacher at the University of California at Irvine, I have taken recent note of the activities at other UC campuses in regards to left-wing activities. It seems to me that of all the UC campuses-even UC Berkeley-that UC Santa Cruz seems to be taking the lead in left-wing nuttiness these days.

David Horowitz, in his Frontpage Magazine blog, is featuring an article this week on some of the wacko classes that are being offered in the UCSC course catalog, in particular, the so-called Community Studies Department.


"Browse through the University of Santa Cruz course catalog, however, and you will find courses such as the following, offered through the “Community Studies Department,” which informs students: “The goal of this seminar is to learn how to organize a revolution. We will learn what communities past and present have done and are doing to resist, challenge, and overcome systems of power including (but not limited to) global capitalism, state oppression, and racism.” As we note in the book, this is the outline of a political agenda, not the description of a scholarly inquiry, and a clear instance of the kind of political indoctrination that the school’s own regulations prohibit – in theory, if not in practice." (Frontpage)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Being so enticed, I searched through the Community Studies section of USSC's website and noted the following- from the UCSC catalogue:

"Community studies is an interdisciplinary major that integrates scholarship and community engagement in both research and teaching. Since its founding in 1969, and across radically changing political landscapes, the department has maintained a focus on identifying, analyzing, and helping to construct sites for social change and cultural transformation. To this end, we address principles of social justice and the dynamics of racial and class inequity as well as explore constructions of community and their implications.

The range of the faculty’s disciplines, research interests, and arenas of civic engagement permits the department to delve into cross-cutting contemporary approaches that color every aspect of social life. The major offers community studies students a lively choice of concentrations in which to specialize, including public health and health politics, political economy, agriculture and food justice, race and racism, historical and contemporary social movements, globalization, politics of culture, and systems of documentary representation. Pedagogically, community studies relies on developing a dynamic critical awareness of the relationship between the theoretical and practical issues involved in social change, and of the wider global contexts in which social justice is defined and achieved. The department’s model of specific communities through residence and participation in (mostly) non-profit organizations with a social change mission. The undergraduate core curriculum focuses on the development of academic tools for social analysis and field observations/participation while deepening students’ knowledge of specific histories and theoretical perspectives that are essential to the student of communities and transformation. Students complete the major by preparing a senior capstone project integrating academic course work, field study, and original research work. The major usually takes about two years to complete.

With the intellectual guidance of a faculty adviser and a field study coordinator, community studies students choose field placements related to one of the department’s areas of focus. Placements have been with health centers, immigrant rights organizations, newspapers, minority media outlets, city planning departments, neighborhood organizations, civil rights groups, farm-to-school programs, battered women’s shelters, legal clinics, programs for seniors, tenant unions, government agencies and the offices of elected officials, trade unions, and other organizations committed to and working for social justice in communities."

Some of their course offerings:


114. Whiteness, Racism, and Anti-Racism.
Examines the social, cultural, institutional, and personal ways that white privilege and racial domination are constructed, maintained, and reproduced in U.S. society. Goal is to reveal the "hidden" quality of whiteness and illuminate effective strategies for anti-racist activism. Enrollment limited to 25. (General Education Code(s): E.) D. Wellman


122. Experiments in Community: Utopia and Communalism in Post-War California.
Traces history and flowering of urban and rural communal experiments in postwar California. Critically examines the counterculture—both alternative and revolutionary wings—and its legacy of, for example, sexual politics, child rearing, art and culture, foodways, environmentalism, architecture, and anti capitalism. (Formerly Experiments in Community: History of Communes in California.) I. Boal

123. Wal-Mart Nation.
Examines origins and growth of Wal-Mart stores as powerful guides to understanding dynamics of contemporary global political economy and, relatedly, the changing fortunes of global social classes.

(Fousesquawk comment- Can you imagine-USSC actually has a course devoted to Walmart??!!)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Aside from Community Studies, a couple of other "departments" caught my eye.


Queer and Sexuality Studies

Feminist Studies
315 Humanities 1
(831)459-4324
fmst@ucsc.edu
http://queer.ucsc.edu/


Program Description

"Scholarship pertaining to the critical study of gender and sexuality can be found across a broad range of departments at UCSC. This presence is manifested in a diverse faculty, in course offerings, and in research programs. Courses with queer content can be found in American studies, anthropology, community studies, feminist studies, film and digital media, history, history of consciousness, legal studies, literature, sociology and theater arts.

For more specialization, departments such as Community Studies, Feminist Studies and Literature have sufficient flexibility to allow students to design a course of study within those majors to explore these interests. For students who prefer to take a more self-directed approach, there is the option of designing an individual major.

Research activities are sponsored by the Queer Theory research cluster (a part of the Center for Cultural Studies), the Center for Justice, Tolerance and Community, the Queer and Sexuality Studies Working Group, and many campus departments and student organizations."

The Lionel Cantú GLBTI Resource Center serves as a clearinghouse for queer activities on the UCSC campus. Each quarter, the center prepares a list of all course offerings with queer content. Information is available at http://queer.ucsc.eduor via e-mail at queer@ucsc.edu.

Fousesquawk comment: How is it that a university department actually names itself "Queer and Sexuality Studies"? The term "Queer" is a term I stopped using to refer to homosexuals when I was in high school.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Then there is this department:

History of Consciousness
415 Humanities 1
(831) 459-2757
http://histcon.ucsc.edu/

Faculty

Gopal Balakrishnan, Associate Professor of History of Consciousness
Classics of political thought from Plato to Rousseau, early modern and modern European intellectual history, historical sociology, the history and future of capitalism, nationalism-----(This guy is associated with the New Left Review- a journal that is aptly named.)

James T. Clifford, Professor of History of Consciousness
History of anthropology, travel, and exoticism; transnational cultural studies, museum studies, indigenous studies

Angela Y. Davis, Professor of History of Consciousness and Feminist Studies
Feminism, African American studies, critical theory, popular music culture and social consciousness, philosophy of punishment (women's jails and prisons)

Teresa de Lauretis, Professor of History of Consciousness, Literature, and Film and Digital Media
Semiotics, psychoanalysis, feminism, film theory, literary theory, queer studies

Barbara L. Epstein, Professor of History of Consciousness
Social movements and theories of social movements, 20th-century U.S. politics and culture, Marxism and related theories of social change

Donna J. Haraway, Professor of History of Consciousness and Feminist Studies
Feminist theory, cultural and historical studies of science and technology, relation of life and human sciences, human-animal relations, and animal studies

David S. Marriott, Professor of History of Consciousness
Literary theory, psychoanalysis, black cultural theory and philosophies of race, literary and visual cultures of modernism

Victor Burgin, Professor Emeritus of History of Consciousness

Hayden White, Professor Emeritus of History of Consciousness

Extended Department Faculty

John Brown Childs, Professor of Sociology
Ethnic conflict and transcommunal cooperation; sociology of knowledge; African American, Native American, Latino interactions

Michael H. Cowan, Professor of American Studies
American cultural theory and history, history of American studies, symbolic expression in American life, urban cultural studies, American literary studies, studies in the institutional culture of higher education

Gina Dent, Associate Professor of Feminist Studies, History of Consciousness, and Legal Studies
Africana literary and cultural studies, legal theory, popular culture

Shelly Errington, Professor of Anthropology
Globalization of folk art, visual and social semiotics, photography, film, the Internet and digital media, Southeast Asia, and Latin America

Carla Freccero, Distinguished Professor of French Literature and Feminist Studies
Renaissance studies, French and Italian language and literature, early modern studies, postcolonial theories and literature, contemporary feminist theories and politics, queer theory, U.S. popular culture

Herman S. Gray, Professor of Sociology
Cultural studies, media and television studies, black cultural politics, social theory

Susan Harding, Professor of Anthropology
Culture, politics, narrative, gender, local/global studies, ethnographic writing, fundamentalism, Christianity, state-making, aging, America, and Spain

David C. Hoy, Professor of Philosophy
Kant, Hegel, Nietzsche, Heidegger, Derrida, Foucault, phenomenology, poststructuralism, and contemporary European philosophy

Robert L. Meister, Professor of Politics
Political and moral philosophy, law and social theory, Marxian theory, institutional analysis, antidiscrimination law

Helene Moglen, Professor of Literature and Feminist Studies; UC Presidential Chair
The English novel; feminist, critical, cultural, and psychoanalytic theory; gender and genre in social and psychological contexts

Triloki Nath Pandey, Professor of Anthropology
Native peoples of North America, cultures of India, political anthropology, anthropological theories and comparisons

Andrew Szasz, Associate Professor of Sociology
Environmental sociology (environmental movements, policy, environmental justice); theory

Richard Terdiman, Professor of Literature
Nineteenth- and 20th-century French and European literature and culture, literary and cultural theory, contemporary critical theory, cultural globalization

Anna Tsing, Professor of Anthropology
Culture and politics, feminist theory and gender in the U.S., social landscapes and tropical forest ethnoecologies, ethnicity, local power and relations to the state in Indonesia, Southeast Asia, and the U.S.

Judy Yung, Professor Emerita of American Studies

Patricia Zavella, Professor of Latin American and Latino Studies
Relationship between women's work and domestic labor, poverty, family, sexuality and social networks, feminist studies, ethnographic research methods, and transnational migration of Mexicana/o workers and U.S. capital
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
After reading the descriptions of the above professors, you have any doubts as to their political bents, I invite you to google them and determine how many of them are not on the far left of the political spectrum.

Here are the courses offered in this exciting department.

Lower-Division Courses Program Description

"History of consciousness is an interdisciplinary graduate program centered in the humanities, with links to the social sciences, physical and biological sciences, and arts. It is concerned with forms of human expression and social action as they are manifested in specific historical, cultural, and political contexts. The program stresses flexibility and originality. Interest is focused on problems rather than disciplines. Although students are prepared to teach in particular fields, the emphasis is on questions that span a number of different approaches.

Over more than 30 years of existence, the history of consciousness program has become widely recognized as a leader of interdisciplinary scholarship. Program graduates are influential scholars at prominent universities, and dissertations have been published by major publishing houses and academic presses. Graduates currently find academic employment in a wide range of disciplines, including literature, feminist studies, science studies, anthropology, sociology, American studies, cultural studies, ethnic studies, communications, the study of religion, and philosophy. In addition, history of consciousness graduates work as filmmakers, museum researchers, free-lance writers, postdoctoral researchers, and academic administrators.

Since the curriculum concentrates on theoretical and methodological issues and is concerned with the integration of disciplines, candidates for admission are expected to have a relatively clear idea of the project they wish to pursue. Experience of advanced work in one or more fields is preferred, but not required.

History of consciousness emphasizes a variety of topics in its seminars and research pursuits. These areas of research include studies at the intersection of race, sexuality, and gender; global capitalism and cultural processes; psychoanalytic and semiotic theories of the image; science and technology studies; theories and histories of religion; social movements; and literary studies and poetics. Seminars are regularly offered in these and other areas of ongoing faculty research.

History of consciousness has strong cooperative relations with associated faculty from other campus programs, scholars who offer seminars and participate in advising, qualifying exams, and thesis committees. Within the limits of seminar size and faculty time, cross-disciplinary work in graduate courses offered by other departments is encouraged. The formal list of associated faculty is a non-exhaustive indication of advising possibilities beyond the program’s core faculty. Campus research organizations, such as the UCSC Center for Cultural Studies, the Institute for Humanities Research, the Institute of Advanced Feminist Research, and the Chicano/Latino Research Center, also provide venues for collaborative work."

Requirements

Students are required to enroll in a minimum of two courses per quarter until advancement to candidacy (normally achieved no later than the fourth year).

Incoming students are required to take a minimum of five history of consciousness graduate seminars during the first two years. In the first year, students are required to take the introductory seminar, course 203A, Approaches to History of Consciousness. In the course of the first year, students must also take a writing intensive “B” seminar, either 203B, Approaches, or a “B” seminar following another seminar the student has taken. By the end of the first year, students are expected to complete a full seminar paper. Unless an exception is approved by the director of Graduate Studies, “B” courses do not count toward the five seminars selected to fulfill the basic department requirement. The remainder of the courses taken to fulfill university enrollment requirements may include not only history of consciousness seminars but also independent study with specific faculty or graduate seminars offered in other departments.

Additional requirements for the Ph.D. vary with individual disciplinary and interdisciplinary needs and are determined in consultation with relevant faculty and the chair of the program.

Advancement to candidacy depends on the general quality of a student’s work; demonstration of proficiency in a foreign language relevant to the student’s area of work, either by passing a written exam administered by the department or successfully completing a language course approved by the department; success in the qualifying exam; and proposal of an acceptable thesis topic. The qualifying exam is centered on a qualifying essay that demonstrates the candidate’s ability to do extended, dissertation-level research and analysis relevant to the proposed thesis topic and dissertation plan. The exam focuses on the student’s research project and on the fields of scholarship it presupposes.

After advancement to candidacy, required by the end of the fourth year, students concentrate on the writing of the dissertation. The current normative time to degree limit of seven years means that a student usually has at least three years after advancement to candidacy for completion of the dissertation.

Students also have the option of doing advanced work in a traditional discipline and receiving a parenthetical degree notation of this specialization. In such cases, students must satisfy the appropriate department’s criteria. Currently such degree notations may be negotiated with American studies, anthropology, literature, philosophy, sociology, and feminist studies. Students are expected to complete at least one year of supervised teaching as part of the degree requirements.

Applications

The deadline for applications to the History of Consciousness program is December 1 of each year. Admissions information and application materials are available online at graddiv.ucsc.edu.

Applications are invited from students with backgrounds and interests in the humanities and social sciences and are especially encouraged from individuals with a clear idea of the project they wish to undertake. Strong preference is given to applicants working in areas for which the faculty resources in history of consciousness are appropriate and available. Graduate Record Examination (GRE) scores are required as is a writing sample of no more than 10 pages.

Admission is for the fall quarter only.

It is important to note that in light of California’s elimination of affirmative action as an admissions criterion, the history of consciousness department reaffirms its commitment to the principles of affirmative action. These principles mean a commitment to diversity, equal opportunity, and outreach to underrepresented communities. Further, this commitment underlines our understanding that the very fabric and quality of our scholarship depends on the representation and interplay of diverse experience and perspectives. So defined, affirmative action is reflected in every aspect of the history of consciousness program, including scholarship, teaching, admissions, hiring, and the process of departmental governance."

Fousesquawk comment: First of all, does the above comment about affirmative action implicate that despite the law, this department is taking the position of -TO HELL WITH THE LAW?

Secondly, can anybody make sense of this "Consciousness thing"? Please excuse me, folks. I only have a Masters degree, but to me, consciousness means something like being awake. Is that opposed to the "History of Being Passed Out Drunk" (which I can relate to)? Seems to me, once you get around this thing about being conscious, this is a bunch of leftist rigamarol.

But then, all you have to do is get to the name, Angela Davis, and it all becomes crystal clear. For those of you to young to remember, Angela Davis, one of the department honchos, is much more than just a PHD on the list of professors. Back in the 1960s and 1970s, Angela Davis was a leading radical in California, associated with the Communist Party and the Black Panthers and charged in the courthouse killing of a judge in an attempted prisoner breakout. Subsequent to the incident, she became a fugitive, was arrested in New York and tried in California (where she was acquitted.) Since then, Davis has become (again) a darling of the academic left at UCSC where she teaches to this day.

Here are the courses they offer:

80A. Culture and Ideology in the 20th Century.
A survey of the principle ideological issues of the 20th century—attitudes toward sex, race, class, work, violence, and knowledge—viewed from the perspective of structuralist and semiological theories of culture. (General Education Code(s): T4-Humanities and Arts.) A. Davis

80B. Constructions of the Exotic.
Analyzes ethnographic and auto-ethnographic representations of non-Western peoples. Films, video, ethnographies, novels, and journalism are considered, paying attention to specific histories of colonial and postcolonial contact which influence images of "culture" and "identity." (General Education Code(s): T4-Humanities and Arts.) J. Clifford

80E. Myth and Religion.
A study of the nature of religion and myth as well as their interrelationship; the beginnings and functions of myth, its major themes in various cultures, its relationship to sacrifice and ritual, and its role in selected religions and cultures throughout the world. Offered in alternate academic years. (General Education Code(s): T4-Humanities and Arts.) G. Lease, The Staff

80I. Philosophy, Race, and Gender.
What is the concept of the human? How is the concept of the human related to race and gender? How has it changed from the 18th century to the 20th century? Focuses on the founding texts of the German Enlightenment. (General Education Code(s): T4-Humanities and Arts.) The Staff

80J. Social Movements in the U.S.
Traces the history of social movements in the late 19th- and 20th-century U.S., including populism, labor, socialism, Communism, the New Left, civil rights, feminism. Looks at the relationship between cultures of protest and mainstream popular and political cultures. (General Education Code(s): T5-Humanities and Arts or Social Sciences.) B. Epstein

80L. Will the Real Jesus Please Stand Up?.
Christianity claims but one Jesus at its foundation; the sources, however, reveal many Jesuses. Is there a "real" Jesus among the memories of the earliest Jesusites, or among the Jesus-types of Late Antiquity? Or only contradictory choices? (General Education Code(s): T4-Humanities and Arts.) G. Lease

80M. Imagining Popular Culture.
Focuses on representations of race, class, and gender in contemporary popular culture images, particularly film and television. Attendance is required at both lectures and screenings. (General Education Code(s): T4-Humanities and Arts.) The Staff

80N. Politics of Emotion/Emotion of Politics.
Engages histories of affect, the complex realms of the senses, feelings, emotions, and the body. Asks questions about the role of emotions in the making and unmaking of the contemporary political order and marginal cultures of feeling. (General Education Code(s): T5-Humanities and Arts or Social Sciences.) T. Spira

80O. Hitler, National Socialism, and Religion.
A critical evaluation of Hitler as a religious leader and his National Socialism as both a religious movement and an example of 20th-century political theology: a study of the relationship between religion and politics. (General Education Code(s): T5-Humanities and Arts or Social Sciences.) G. Lease

80Q. Science as Culture and Practice.
Using tools from the analysis of social history, visual and material culture, narrative, and laboratory and field practices, introduces students to modern science, technology, and medicine studies. Examples come especially from 20th- and 21st-century life and human and information sciences. May be repeated for credit. (General Education Code(s): T5-Humanities and Arts or Social Sciences.) D. Haraway

80T. Art and Life: Introduction to Interventionist Art and Visual Studies.
Emphasizes how interventionist practices and activist art might inform students' political development and actions. Explores modes of expression and political identities that are useful after college. Leads to the production of alternatives to mainstream media. (General Education Code(s): T4-Humanities and Arts.) L. Kelley

80U. Modernity and Its Discontents.
Offers an introduction to the idea of modernity from Kant to Freud, Niezsche to Fanon. (General Education Code(s): T4-Humanities and Arts.) D. Marriott

Upper-Division Courses

102. Philosophy and Poetics.
Introduction to the relationship between philosophy and poetics in some major 19th- and 20th-century poets and thinkers. Enrollment restricted to juniors and seniors. Enrollment limited to 30. D. Marriott

111. States, War, Capitalism.
Survey of seminal work on ancient origins of the state, diverse geo-political systems of war and diplomacy, and consequences of the formation of the world market on the evolution of geo-political systems up to and beyond the wars of today. Enrollment restricted to juniors and seniors. Enrollment limited to 35. G. Balakrishnan

113. Participatory Dissent.
Brings together debates in feminism, contemporary art, and radical pedagogy, investigating the impact of the feminist revolution in the arts and humanities on debates in radical pedagogy and art as social practice. N. Loveless

118. Jewish Social Movements.
Jewish social movements of the late 19th and 20th centuries, in Europe (Eastern and Western) and the U.S.: the confrontation between Hasidism and Haskahah, tensions between socialism and Zionism, between religiosity and secularism, the mutual influences among these tendencies. (Also offered as History 185D. Students cannot receive credit for both courses.) Enrollment restricted to juniors and seniors. Enrollment limited to 20. (General Education Code(s): E.) B. Epstein

126. Film Fantasies.
A focused study of cinema as a social technology for the production of public and private fantasies: how films contribute to shaping the image a culture has of itself and how film viewing may influence individual fantasies, values, and identities. Enrollment restricted to juniors and seniors. Enrollment limited to 80. T. De Lauretis

145E. Topics in Medical Humanities.
Medical humanities is an interdisciplinary field of humanities (literature, philosophy, ethics, history, and religion) concerned with its application to medical education and practice. The humanities provide insight into the human condition, suffering, personhood, and our responsibility to each other; and offer an historical perspective on medical science. Course helps prepare students for the reading comprehension and writing parts of the MCAT. Satisfies the Modern Literature concentration. Students cannot receive credit for this course and Literature 80K. (Also offered as Modern Literary Studies 145E. Students cannot receive credit for both courses.) W. Godzich

199. Tutorial.
A program of individual study arranged between an undergraduate student and a faculty member. Students submit petition to sponsoring agency. May be repeated for credit. The Staff

Graduate Courses

203A. Approaches to History of Consciousness.
An introduction to history of consciousness required of all incoming students. The seminar concentrates on theory, methods, and research techniques. Major interpretive approaches drawn from cultural and political analysis are discussed in their application to specific problems in the history of consciousness. Prerequisite(s): first-year standing in the program. See the department office for more information. (Formerly course 203.) The Staff

203B. Approaches to History of Consciousness.
Writing-intensive course based on readings in course 203A. Prerequisite(s): course 203A. Enrollment restricted to graduate students. Enrollment limited to 9. G. Balakrishnan

204A. Introduction to Cultural Studies.
Classic texts from the British cultural studies tradition. Traces later developments in North America, Latin America, Australia, and elsewhere. Asks how class analysis has been complicated by work on race, ethnicity, gender, sexuality, and postcoloniality. Enrollment restricted to graduate students. Enrollment limited to 20May be repeated for credit. J. Clifford

204B. Introduction to Cultural Studies.
Writing intensive course based on readings in course 204A. Prerequisite(s): course 204A. Enrollment restricted to graduate students. Enrollment limited to 20. J. Clifford

205A. Theories of Slavery.
Explores philosophical, legal, and socio-historical analyses of slavery. Focus on Atlantic slavery and the production of race and gender formations, complemented by discussion on contemporary forms of slavery. Impact of historical slavery on prevailing discourses and institutions. (Also offered as Feminist Studies 225A. Students cannot receive credit for both courses.) Enrollment restricted to graduate students. Enrollment limited to 15. A. Davis

205B. Theories of Slavery.
Writing-intensive course based on readings in History of Consciousness 205A and Feminist Studies 225A . (Also offered as Feminist Studies 225B. Students cannot receive credit for both courses.) Prerequisite(s): course 205A or Feminist Studies 225A. Enrollment restricted to graduate students. Enrollment limited to 15. A. Davis

207. Theory of the Text.
An introduction to contemporary theories of textual interpretation: anthropological, linguistic, historical, literary, semiotic, and philosophical. Consideration of different kinds of texts and ways of reading them: from dream reports, folktales, and myths, through musical scores, monuments, rituals, games, and codes, to poems, novels, and political tracts. Enrollment restricted to graduate students. Enrollment limited to 15. May be repeated for credit. T. De Lauretis

208A. Radical Critiques of Penality.
Examines recent theories of imprisonment, focusing on the philosophical and criminological literature associated with scholarly and activist movements arguing for prison abolition. In considering the disarticulation of crime and punishment, race, class, and gender serve as principal analytical categories. Enrollment restricted to graduate students. Enrollment limited to 15. A. Davis

208B. Radical Critiques of Penality.
Writing intensive course based on readings in course 208A. Prerequisite(s): course 208A. Enrollment restricted to graduate students. Enrollment limited to 15. A. Davis

209A. Women of Color: Feminist Theories and Practices.
Examination of feminist consciousness in the indigenous and diasporic cultural histories of women of color. Analysis of "feminist moments" in these histories and their epistemological implications for the construction of feminist theories that take into account intersections of gender, ethnicity, class, and sexual orientation. Discussion of possible paradigmatic shifts in feminist theory. Enrollment restricted to graduate students. Enrollment limited to 15. A. Davis

209B. Women of Color: Feminist Theories and Practices.
Writing intensive course based on readings in course 209A. Prerequisite(s): course 209A. Enrollment restricted to graduate students. Enrollment limited to 15. The Staff

210A. Cultural and Historical Studies of Race and Ethnicity.
Explores the historical construction of racial and ethnic categories in the Americas, especially the U.S., in interaction with gender, sexuality, class, and nationality. Intended to introduce current work by UCSC faculty and Bay Area scholars and to stimulate graduate student research projects, the course is organized by intensive reading around key questions, followed by presentations by invited scholars. Emphasizes research resources and methodologies. Enrollment restricted to graduate students. Enrollment limited to 15. The Staff

210B. Cultural and Historical Studies of Race and Ethnicity.
Writing intensive course based on readings in course 210A. Prerequisite(s): course 210A. Enrollment restricted to graduate students. Enrollment limited to 15. The Staff

211A. French Hegel.
Introduces the "return to Hegel" in the work of some major 20th-century French thinkers. Enrollment restricted to graduate students. Enrollment limited to 15. D. Marriott

212. Feminist Theory and the Law.
Interrogation of the relationship between law and its instantiating gendered categories, supported by feminist, queer, Marxist, critical race, and postcolonial theories. Topics include hypostasization of legal categories, the contest between domestic and international human rights frameworks, overlapping civil and communal codes, cultural explanations in the law, the law as text and archive, testimony and legal subjectivity. (Also offered as Feminist Studies 212. Students cannot receive credit for both courses.) Enrollment restricted to graduate students. Enrollment limited to 15. G. Dent

213A. Representation.
An introduction to contemporary theories including semiotics, psychoanalysis, poststructuralism, and the feminist critique of representation. Emphasis on questions of difference and the construction of the subject in culture. Enrollment restricted to graduate students. Enrollment limited to 15. May be repeated for credit. T. De Lauretis

213B. Representation.
Writing intensive course based on readings in course 213A. Prerequisite(s): course 213A. Enrollment restricted to graduate students. Enrollment limited to 15. May be repeated for credit. T. De Lauretis

214A. Studies in History, Religion, and Myth.
Selected events, figures, and ideas from histories of religions: their sources, production, and functions. Emphasis on 19th- and 20th-century theories of religion, the problems of origin and institution, and the relationship between particular histories and their mythologies. Enrollment restricted to graduate standing. Enrollment limited to 15. May be repeated for credit. G. Lease

214B. Studies in History, Religion, and Myth.
Writing intensive course based on readings in course 214A. Prerequisite(s): course 214A. Enrollment restricted to graduate standing. Enrollment limited to 15. May be repeated for credit. G. Lease

215A. Critical Theory in the Marxist Tradition.
An introduction to classic texts of the Frankfurt School, focusing on works by Adorno, Horkheimer, Benjamin, and Marcuse. Explores their uses and critiques of Marxism, emphasizing questions of the relation between philosophy and history, theory and praxis, aesthetics and politics, and identifying issues relevant to contemporary debates around race, class, and gender. Enrollment restricted to graduate students. Enrollment limited to 15. May be repeated for credit. A. Davis

215B. Critical Theory in the Marxist Tradition.
Writing intensive course based on readings in course 215A. Prerequisite(s): course 215A . Enrollment restricted to graduate students. Enrollment limited to 15. May be repeated for credit. A. Davis

217A. Seminar: Topics in Feminist Theory.
Studies in the theory and history of feminist consciousness; analysis of the main areas of a specifically feminist interest; determination of the theoretical bases for a distinctively feminist perspective on the principal problems of the life and human sciences; examination of relations of class, race, and gender in feminist theory and practice. Enrollment restricted to graduate students. Enrollment limited to 15. May be repeated for credit. The Staff

217B. Seminar: Topics in Feminist Theory.
Writing intensive course based on readings in course 217A. Prerequisite(s): course 217A. Enrollment restricted to graduate students. Enrollment limited to 15. May be repeated for credit. The Staff

218A. Postcolonial Theory.
Study of selected topics in postcolonial theory, including decolonizing critiques of Western knowledges and epistemologies, nationalism, gender and sexuality, cultural representations of neo-colonialism and imperialism, subalternity, history and historical transformation, and global relations of dominations. Enrollment restricted to graduate students. Enrollment limited to 15. The Staff

218B. Postcolonial Theory.
Writing intensive course based on readings in course 218A. Prerequisite(s): course 218A. Enrollment restricted to graduate students. Enrollment limited to 15. The Staff

219A. Psychoanalysis and Cultural Criticism.
Readings in Freudian psychoanalytic theory from Freud and his contemporaries to the present, with emphasis on concepts (such as the unconscious, sexuality, fantasy, narcissism) that have informed recent cultural criticism around questions of social identity, subjectivity, marginality, and power. Enrollment restricted to graduate students. Enrollment limited to 15. T. De Lauretis

219B. Psychoanalysis and Cultural Criticism.
Writing intensive course based on readings in course 219A. Prerequisite(s): course 219A. Enrollment restricted to graduate students. Enrollment limited to 15. T. De Lauretis

220A. Globalization and Cultural Process.
Discusses theories of globalization and its cultural effects. How are cultural forms destroyed, imposed, appropriated, hybridized, translated, invented, and reinvented at local, national, regional, and transnational levels? Historical and ethnographic focus on tourist encounters, museums, nativisms, film/media performances, etc. Enrollment restricted to graduate students Enrollment limited to 20. May be repeated for credit. J. Clifford

220B. Globalization and Cultural Process.
Writing intensive course based on readings in course 220A. Prerequisite(s): course 220A. Enrollment limited to 20. May be repeated for credit. J. Clifford

222A. Theories of Late Capitalism, Nationalism, and the Politics of Identity.
Looks at the theoretical literature on what is variously called late capitalism/postindustrialism/postfordism, and in that context considers the rise of nationalism and identity politics in the latter part of the 20th century. The primary focus is on the U.S. and Western Europe, but questions of the globalization of capital and the transformation of relations between "the West" and "the Third World" are also considered. Written work for the course consists of weekly short papers. Enrollment restricted to graduate students. Enrollment limited to 15. B. Epstein

222B. Theories of Late Capitalism, Nationalism, and the Politics of Identity.
Writing intensive course based on readings in course 222A. Prerequisite(s): course 222A. Enrollment restricted to graduate students. Enrollment limited to 15. B. Epstein

223. Recent European Philosophy.
Seminar on recent developments in European philosophy, with particular attention to German theorists such as Nietzsche, Heidegger, Gadamer, Horkheimer, Adorno, or Habermas. Theorists such as Sartre, Merleau-Ponty, Derrida, Foucault, Bourdieu, Levinas, Laclau, or Vattimo may be read as well. (Also offered as Philosophy 223. Students cannot receive credit for both courses.) Enrollment restricted to graduate students. Enrollment limited to 15. May be repeated for credit. D. Hoy

224. History of Consciousness.
Examination of contemporary theories of consciousness in both analytic and continental traditions. Among those who deflate modern philosophy's preoccupation with consciousness are not only Dennett, Davidson, and Rorty, but also Heidegger, Foucault, and Derrida. Among those who argue for irreducibility of subjectivity are not only Searle, Nagel, and Chalmers, but also Sartre, Merleau-Ponty, and Levinas. Discussion of parallel readings from both philosophical perspectives. (Also offered as Philosophy 256. Students cannot receive credit for both courses.) Enrollment restricted to graduate students. Enrollment limited to 25. D. Hoy

225. The Politics of Affect.
Point of departure is the question of the political, posed with respect to psychoanalysis. The underlying question is what the political does to psychoanalysis, but also what the unconscious does to the political. Enrollment restricted to graduate students. Enrollment limited to 15. D. Marriott

228. Fundamental Problems of Metapolitics.
Focuses on seminal works of political thought: the first half devoted to ancient and modern classics; the second considering several major contemporary reflections. Aims to reconstruct and assess the claims regarding epistemic conditions and criteria of metapolitical judgment. Enrollment restricted to graduate students. Enrollment limited to 15. G. Balakrishnan

229A. Aesthetics and Politics.
Studies the connections between questions of aesthetics and politics, including questions of beauty, genre, pleasure, narrative form, structures of feeling and style, in literature, film and music, as these relate to the politics of class, race, gender, sexuality, and decolonization. Enrollment restricted to graduate students. Enrollment limited to 15. The Staff

230A. Poetry, Language, Thought.
Introduces the relation between philosophy and poetics in some major 20th-century poets and thinkers. Enrollment restricted to graduate students. Enrollment limited to 15. D. Marriott

230B. Poetry, Language, Thought.
Writing-intensive course based on readings in course 230A. Prerequisite(s): course 230A, or permission of instructor. Enrollment limited to 15. D. Marriott

232A. Third World Feminisms and Globalization.
Studies third world feminist theories and struggles and their relations to globalization; topics include nationalism, development, transnational practices, identity politics, human rights, especially the ways in which Third World feminisms respond and contribute to political, economic, social, and cultural transformations. Enrollment restricted to graduate students. Enrollment limited to 15. The Staff

233A. Theories of Modernity and Postmodernity.
Study of social and cultural theories of modernity and postmodernity; analysis of various conceptualizations of the modern and the postmodern and their relation to production, history, aesthetics, cultural identity, social struggle; texts from a variety of disciplines (literature, sociology, philosophy). Enrollment restricted to graduate students. Enrollment limited to 15. The Staff

233B. Theories of Modernity and Postmodernity.
Writing intensive course based on readings in course 233A. Prerequisite(s): course 233A. Enrollment restricted to graduate students. Enrollment limited to 15. The Staff

234A. Social Movements in the 20th-Century U.S.
The history of major social movements in the 20th-century U.S., including populism, labor, socialism and communism, civil rights, the women's movement, the anti-nuclear movement. Various theoretical perspectives on the rise and fall of social movements. Enrollment restricted to graduate students. Enrollment limited to 15. Offered in alternate academic years. May be repeated for credit. B. Epstein

234B. Social Movements in the 20th-Century U.S.
Writing intensive course based on readings in course 234A. Prerequisite(s): course 234A. Enrollment restricted to graduate students. Enrollment limited to 15. May be repeated for credit. B. Epstein

235A. Theory of Religion.
The difficulty of defining religion (universal essence vs. local/individual experience), of specifying its categorical boundaries, and of generating a theory based on more traditional disciplines (anthropomorphism, societal, psychic, transcendent, cognitive/ritual, historical/cultural/political). Enrollment restricted to graduate students. Enrollment limited to 15. G. Lease

235B. Theory of Religion.
Writing intensive course based on readings in course 235A. Prerequisite(s): course 235A. Enrollment restricted to graduate students. Enrollment limited to 15. G. Lease

237A. Historical Materialism.
Students read landmark works of classical and contemporary Marxism. Writings from Marx, Lenin, Trotsky, Lukacs, Gramsci, Adorno, Benjamin, Sartre, Althusser, Anderson, Jameson, and Zizek are addressed. Enrollment restricted to graduate students. Enrollment limited to 15. G. Balakrishnan

239A. The Dialectical Legacy.
From Adorno to Zizek rediscoveries of Hegel have provided the impetus for some of the most innovative currents of 20th-century Marxism. Examines the philosophical and historical problems that Marx inherited from Hegel through close readings of their major works. Enrollment restricted to graduate students. Enrollment limited to 15. G. Balakrishnan

239B. The Dialectical Legacy.
From Adorno to Zizek rediscoveries of Hegel have provided the impetus for some of the most innovative currents of 20th-century Marxism. Examines the philosophical and historical problems that Marx inherited from Hegel through close readings of their major works. Enrollment restricted to graduate students. Enrollment limited to 15. G. Balakrishnan

240. Basic Principles of University-Level Pedagogy (1 credit).
Provides training for graduate students in university-level pedagogy in general. Under the supervision of the department chair, coordinated by a graduate student with substantial experience as a teaching assistant. Enrollment restricted to graduate students. May be repeated for credit. The Staff

242A. Violence and Phenomenology: Fanon/Hegel/Sartre.
Study of the work and influence of Frantz Fanon from a range of viewpoints: existential, phenomenological, psychoanalytic, and political; a variety of genres: film, literature, case history, and critique; and a set of institutional histories: clinical, cultural, and intellectual. Enrollment restricted to graduate students. Enrollment limited to 15. D. Marriott

242B. Violence and Phenomenology: Fanon/Hegel/Sartre.
Writing intensive course based on readings in course 242A. Prerequisite: course 242A. Enrollment restricted to graduate students. Enrollment limited to 15. D. Marriott

243A. Nationalism, Anti-Semitism, and Jewish Resistance in World War II.
Jewish resistance to Nazism during World War II, in Eastern Europe, and its historical context. Includes the pre-war rise in nationalism and anti-Semitism in Poland and Lithuania, Jewish integration in the Soviet Union, and the consequences for wartime resistance. (Also offered as History 256. Students cannot receive credit for both courses.) Enrollment restricted to seniors and graduate students. Enrollment limited to 15. B. Epstein

247. Performance/Performativities.
Performance acts and theories of performativity in visual culture from modernity to present. Major theoretical positions subtending the emergence of performances/performativities: subjectivity, identity, temporality, media, ritual, the event, the body and embodiment, collaboration, and politics. (Also offered as Digital Arts and New Media 247. Students cannot receive credit for both courses.) Enrollment restricted to graduate students. Qualified seniors accepted with permission of instructor. Enrollment limited to 15. C. Soussloff

250A. Foundations in Science Studies.
Critical inquiry into topics in the history, sociology, anthropology, and philosophy of science and technology. Organized around the position that science is its practice, the seminar explores practices of representation, science studies and cultural studies, local/global tensions and networks, and the science question in feminism and antiracism. Enrollment restricted to graduate students. Enrollment limited to 15. K. Barad

250B. Foundations in Science Studies.
Writing intensive course based on readings in course 250A. Prerequisite(s): course 250A. Enrollment restricted to graduate students. Enrollment limited to 15. D. Haraway

251A. Readings in Science Studies.
Focus is on recent literature in social, cultural, and historical studies of science, medicine, and technology. This seminar familiarizes students with current scholarly debates, research networks, national traditions, international exchanges, conference proceedings, interdisciplinary projects, and publication sites. Enrollment restricted to graduate students. Enrollment limited to 15. May be repeated for credit. D. Haraway

251B. Readings in Science Studies.
Second quarter of two-quarter course. Writing-intensive course based on the readings studied in course 251A. Prerequisite: course 251A. Enrollment restricted to graduate students. Enrollment limited to 15. D. Haraway

252. Poststructuralism.
French poststructuralism, with particular attention to the main philosophical texts of Jacques Derrida and Michel Foucault. Other representative theorists as well as critics of poststructuralism are studied as time permits. (Also offered as Philosophy 252. Students cannot receive credit for both courses.) Enrollment restricted to graduate students. Enrollment limited to 15. May be repeated for credit. D. Hoy

253A. Topics in Cultural Analysis.
Advanced graduate seminar in which students do research on focused topics. Each quarter centered on single thematic area. Students read works of culture-theory and exemplary studies illustrating methodologies, problems, and current controversies. Prerequisite(s): minimum of second-year status in the history of consciousness program; instructor evaluates student's ability to participate. Enrollment restricted to graduate students. Enrollment limited to 15. J. Clifford

255A. Carl Schmitt: Political and Legal Order in Modern Thought.
Students study the main translated texts of Carl Schmitt's work, as well as certain secondary commentary on his body of thought. Enrollment restricted to graduate students. Enrollment limited to 15. G. Balakrishnan

256A. Theories of the Visual.
Study of psychoanalytic theories of the visual including the emergence of psychoanalysis and cinema as parallel discourses and the mobilization of key psychoanalytic concepts—scopophilia, voyeurism, fetishism—in Freudian and Lacanian understandings of the gaze so central to film and photographic theory. Enrollment restricted to graduate students. D. Marriott

256B. Theories of the Visual.
Writing intensive course based on readings in course 256A. Prerequisite: course 256A. Enrollment restricted to graduate students. Enrollment limited to 15. D. Marriott

259A. Kant, Lacan, and the Ethics of Psychoanalysis.
Offers an introduction to Jacques Lacan's "Return to Kant" and the response it provokes as a reading of sadism, politics, and ethics. Specific point of entry adopted for course is Lacan's seminar on "The Ethics of Psychoanalysis." Enrollment restricted to graduate students. Enrollment limited to 15. D. Marriott

259B. Kant, Lacan, and the Ethics of Psychoanalysis.
Writing-intensive course based on readings in course 259A. Prerequisite(s): course 259A. Enrollment restricted to graduate students. Enrollment limited to 15. D. Marriott

260A. Film and the Visible.
Study of selected topics in film theory, including the construction of vision and spectatorship; the relations of look, image, and narrative; the formative effects of classic, experimental, and independent cinema in contemporary visual culture; the feminist critique of representation; the role of cinema in the production of public and private fantasies, cultural memory, and identity. Enrollment restricted to graduate students. Enrollment limited to 15. T. De Lauretis

260B. Film and the Visible.
Study of selected topics in film theory, including the construction of vision and spectatorship; the relations of look, image, and narrative; the formative effects of classic, experimental, and independent cinema in contemporary visual culture; the feminist critique of representation; the role of cinema in the production of public and private fantasies, cultural memory, and identity. Prerequisite(s): course 260A. Enrollment restricted to graduate students. Enrollment limited to 15. T. De Lauretis

260C. Film and the Visible.
Writing intensive course based on readings in courses 260A and 260B. Prerequisite(s): course 260A or 260B. Enrollment restricted to graduate students. Enrollment limited to 15. T. De Lauretis

261. Modern Intellectural History.
Survey of 19th- and 20th-century intellectual history that focuses on a cross-section of major works from Hegel to Levi-Strauss. Enrollment restricted to graduate students. Enrollment limited to 15. G. Balakrishnan

264. The Idea of Africa.
Examines the position of Africa in cultural studies and the simultaneous processes of over- and under-representation of the continent that mark enunciations of the global and the local. Themes include defining diaspora, the West as philosophy, and Africa in the global economy. (Also offered as Feminist Studies 264. Students cannot receive credit for both courses.) Enrollment restricted to graduate students. Enrollment limited to 15. G. Dent

291. Advising (2 credits). F,W,S
Independent study formalizing the advisee-adviser relationship. Regular meetings to plan, assess and monitor academic progress, and to evaluate course work as necessary. May be used to develop general bibliography of background reading and trajectory of study in preparation for the qualifying examination. May be repeated for credit. The Staff

292. Practicum in Composition.
A practicum in the genres of scholarly writing, for graduate students working on the composition of their qualifying essay or doctoral dissertation. Enrollment restricted to graduate students. Enrollment limited to 15. D. Haraway, T. De Lauretis, J. Clifford

293. Field Study.
Research carried out in field settings, based on a project approved by the responsible faculty. The student must file a prospectus with the department office before undertaking the research and a final report of activities upon return. May be repeated for credit. The Staff

294. Teaching-Related Independent
Study. F,W,S
Directed graduate research and writing coordinated with the teaching of undergraduates. Students submit petition to sponsoring agency. The Staff

295. Directed Reading.
Systematic working through a prearranged bibliography which is filed as a final report at the end of the quarter with the signature of the instructor. Students submit petition to sponsoring agency. May be repeated for credit. The Staff

296. Special Student Seminar.
A seminar study group for graduate students focusing each quarter on various problems in the history of consciousness. A statement and evaluation of the work done in the course will be provided each quarter by the students who have participated in the course for that quarter, and reviewed by the responsible faculty. May be repeated for credit. The Staff

297. Independent Study.
Independent study and research under faculty supervision. Students submit petition to sponsoring agency. The Staff

298. Doctoral Colloquium.
Under the supervision of a History of Consciousness faculty member, students finishing their dissertation meet weekly or bi-weekly to read and discuss selected draft chapters, design difficulties and composition problems. May be repeated for credit. The Staff

299. Thesis Research.
Prerequisite(s): advancement to candidacy. May be repeated for credit. The Staff



Fousesquawk comment: While some of the above courses seem benign on the surface, who knows what is put out in the classroom? Others are pretty obvious as to their content.

What is going on at UCSC? From reading the above, it looks like everybody up there is smoking their socks-and teaching the students that everything about America and Western Civilization is EVIL. Whoever dreamed up these departments anyway- Queer Studies, Community Studies, and History of Consciousness?

Is there any question but that the agenda of UC Santa Cruz is to turn out a bunch of little leftist graduates?

Saturday, March 14, 2009

Economic Jealousy and Anti-Semitism


Nazi caricature of Jews
(Borse-Stock Exchange. Geld-money)


I've been writing a lot lately about the the rise in anti-Semitism brought to the surface by the fighting in Gaza. I genuinely feel that we are seeing a rise in anti-Jewish feeling in North America and Canada-even in Venezuela, where Hugo Chavez has jumped into the Middle East mess and stirred up anti-Semitic feeling against his small Jewish community. It seems to me that people are starting to say things publicly that I hadn't heard for a long time-the idea that Jews are all-powerful and to blame for a myriad of problems in the world. Now it's the financial crisis.

Yes, according to some folks (largely in the Middle East), the financial crisis we are facing and the failure of the banks is all the fault of the Jews. Why? Simple. Look at the names: Alan Greenspan, Ben Bernanke-and don't forget Bernie Madoff! Why it seems that when you look at the big financiers, bank presidents etc, all you see is Jews-according to these voices.

What we are witnessing is the revival of the old canard that the wealth of the world is controlled by -----Jews.

And don't forget Hollywood. All those big producers and studio heads? They are mostly Jews (albeit liberal Jews). The names that immediately come to mind are Steven Spielberg, David Geffen and Jeffry Katzenberg.

And as would be chairman of the National Intelligence Council, Charles Freeman reminded us-there is a big pro-Israel lobby out there (Jews) that submarined his job (Actually, it was mostly Nancy Pelosi that did him in over controversial pro-China statements he had made.)

And what about those (pro-Israel) "Neo-Cons" who pushed for a strong, pro-Israel Middle East policy (Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle and David Wurmser)?

Conservative radio-talk show host Michael Medved, himself a practicing Jew, was recently involved in a conversation over the air regarding the predominance of Jews in the high levels of Hollywood studios. Medved made the point that rather than be embarrassed or defensive about it, Jewish people should feel proud that so many Jews have reached the pinnacles of the motion picture industry. They did it by hard work and should not have to feel ashamed.

Similarly, why should Jews have to apologize for the fact that they have done so well in the banking industry? They did it the same way the Hollywood moguls did it-through hard work, ingenuity and talent. Just because a scoundrel named Madoff came along shouldn't cast a shadow on the others. (Madoff's victims were virtually all Jewish). People like Greenspan and Bernanke are honorable men.

The fact is that Jews have reached the high positions they hold because of their own hard work and talent. They are also successful in medicine and law. To me, it all boils down to the fact that Jewish people value education and hard work. As a result they rise into the best professions of our society.

Are we to resent the fact that American Jews do well in their lives? That is nothing more than simple jealousy. If they appear to be over-represented in a particular profession, I say, "so what?" It's not like the profession is closed to me.

Similarly, are we supposed to resent the fact that we see so many Asian-American students on our university campuses especially in the California state system? Why is this? It is because their culture insists on getting a good education. If they are running circles around the rest of us, maybe we (including us white folks) should look ourselves in the mirror and ask why we are not doing better. To me, the the fact that the majority of students at UC Irvine are Asian-American is great. They are serious students who don't join in the radical nonsense; they are too busy studying and enjoying their college experience.

You also hear a lot of voices complaining about the jobs that Mexican immigrants (legal or illegal) are taking away from Americans. There is a lot of validity in this, but let's acknowledge the fact that Mexicans (contrary to the old stereotype) are hard-working people who quickly learn a variety of manual skills. I marvel at their ability to work with their hands, something I never became any good at. Of course, since Mexicans tend to come to this country poor, they start out at the lower end of the economic scale. Assuming they remain (legally), the hope is that their children will go on to higher education and enter the other professions as well. That would be true assimilation.

But back to the Jews. I use the above examples to try and make my point. Let's don't be jealous of any group that attains success in America. As long as it is done legally, it should be respected and applauded. Nobody ever kept me out of law school because I wasn't Jewish. The reason I am not a banker has nothing to do with the fact that I am a Gentile. The reason I never became a studio head has nothing to do with the fact that I am a Gentile. (Actually, my father was a unit production manager at several famous studios. He got me a job as a grip one summer at Sam Goldwyn Studios. I hated it.)

Economic jealousy is a powerful and dangerous form of jealousy. (and don't overlook the class envy many of our leaders push even today.) It has haunted Jews in the past in places like tsarist Russia and Germany under Hitler. It is still present. The Israel-Palestinian conflict has unleashed some ugly sentiments against Jews far removed from the Middle East, first, over their perceived universal support for Israel, and now, once again, fingers at being pointed at Jews for other reasons.

Many of these old canards have been brought back to life in the Middle East (where Mein Kampf remains a best-seller to this day), and have spread back to Europe and America through their western-based spokespeople, many of whom are in our universities as students and professors, aided by the usual anti-American leftists who infest our institutions of higher learning. This new form of Jew hatred must be repudiated by all decent people in the West. We know all too well from history where this kind of talk leads to.

And as for who is to blame in this financial crisis, there are many places we can point the finger to in banking, politics and other institutions. However, it has nothing to do with religion, race or any other ethnic factor. We have all been losers, and we are all in this together. Any suggestion that The Jews are too blame for this mess is absurd on its face and should be repudiated.

Friday, March 13, 2009

Mrs Sidney Williams (Maxine Waters) and Conflict of Interest


Mrs Sidney Williams aka Maxine Waters (D-CA)


Maxine Waters (D-CA) is one of the most obnoxious of all the people serving in Congress. This is the woman who tried to make a case that the CIA had deliberately helped smuggle drugs into the inner city of Los Angeles in order to poison black people. This is the woman who interceded in a DEA investigation involving a Houston-based rap producer-who just happened to be a childhood friend of Waters' husband, Sidney Williams. According to today's Orange County Register, Waters interceded last year with the US Treasury Department to help a company linked to her husband.

According to the article (p 5), Waters called for a meeting last year between bank regulators and minority bank representatives of OneUnited Bank, in which the representatives asked for 50 million dollars in bailout funds. This is the same Massachusetts bank that Rep Barney Frank has recently lobbied on behalf of.

During the September 2008 meeting, Waters failed to mention that her husband, Mr Williams, had served on the bank's board of directors and has owned "at least $250,000 of stock in it." The article quoted one of the former Treasury officials, Jeb Mason, a former deputy asst secretary of the Treasury Dept.

..."They should have least let us know" (about the relationship),said Mason to the New York Times.

Although OneUnited did not get the $50 million, it did receive $12 million from the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP), according to the OC Register article. (That $12million came courtesy of the efforts of-you guessed it-Barney Frank.)

However, I am sure there was no connection with Maxine Waters and her husband. What say you, Mr Frank? What say you, Ms Waters?

Thursday, March 12, 2009

Charles Manson Withdraws from Obama Cabinet Post


This morning, Charles Manson withdrew his name from consideration for the post of Special Assistant to the President Without Portfolio in the Obama Administration citing malicious rumors about his past and needing to spend more time with "his Family". The President accepted Manson's resignation "with regret" while wishing him success in his future endeavors. This latest withdrawal continues a string of similar withdrawals plaguing the Administration in its on-going efforts to fill government posts.

White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs blamed the Manson problem on a "bureaucratic snafu" related to the vetting process. Apparently, there were no records available for Manson prior to 1970, making the vetting process more difficult.

"Mistakes were made", said Gibbs.

According to an FBI spokesman, the Bureau was unable to find anything in Manson's background. "We checked back almost 40 years, said the spokesman. "His record was clean."

Manson, in announcing his withdrawal, blasted the "Republican Smear Machine" and unnamed special interests for spreading rumors about his past prior to 1970. Asked about his plans, Manson said that he will return to his home in California, where he will continue working on the issues that matter to America (like prison reform, prison overcrowding, prison food etc).

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid expressed sadness that Manson was being denied an opportunity to continue "his great record of public service to America." House Speaker Nancy Pelosi was unavailable for comment as she was flying somewhere on her own government jet. (Where was she flying to? Nobody knows..... She even doesn't know.)

Finally, Vice President Joe Biden said.......forget it-you don't want to know.