Hat tip to Daily Caller
Last night, Occupy DC protesters tried to crash the DC Convention Center where Americans for Prosperity was holding their Defending America Prosperity convention. A Daily Caller reporter and film crew was on hand. Here is what happened. It ain't pretty.
http://dailycaller.com/2011/11/05/chaos-video/
(Funny. I never saw that at a Tea Party event.)
Back in the 1980s, when I was stationed with DEA in Milan, Italy, one of the State Department officials in the consulate, a fellow with a very dry sense of humor, told us about his younger brother. The story went something like this:
"When he was 18, he attended Woodstock. To this day, it's the greatest thing he has ever done in his life."
I have a feeling that many of these slugs will look back on Friday night in the same sense.
"God bless them."
Sunday, November 6, 2011
Saturday, November 5, 2011
Occupy Boston Occupies Israeli Consulate
Hat tip to Atlas Shrugs
In Boston, some of the little rascals of the Occupy movement decided to don their Palestinian keffiyas* and occupy the Israeli Consulate (private property). Here is the YouTube video:
* Keffiyas are Arab scarves. The Palestinian ones are those with the black and white doo-dads. They are quite the rage with the university set.
"God bless them."
In Boston, some of the little rascals of the Occupy movement decided to don their Palestinian keffiyas* and occupy the Israeli Consulate (private property). Here is the YouTube video:
* Keffiyas are Arab scarves. The Palestinian ones are those with the black and white doo-dads. They are quite the rage with the university set.
"God bless them."
Where I Stand Today on Herman Cain
I have been making a lot of comment about the MSNBC handling of the Herman Cain allegations, which is shameful, in my view. In the next days, more is surely going to come out. It may very well turn out that Cain behaved badly-to what extent- I don't know. It may turn out that he tried to "score"-for lack of a better word- or actually did "score". At that point, we have to decide what we think about him. It may turn out that he did something worse than merely cheat on his wife. It may very well turn out that Cain will shortly have no other choice but to drop out of the Republican primary race. Frankly, I am feeling pessimistic about his future, and I have to leave the door open to the possibility that once everything comes out, I would no longer support him. (That is not to say that Herman Cain is my first choice among the candidates. He is not, and I honestly have not yet decided who I would like to see nominated to run against President Obama.)
Having said that, I think it is still important to point out that at this point, we still do not know who his accusers are, nor do we know what the specific acts are which he has been accused of. That has not stopped the mob at MSNBC from convicting him on air every night. In the end, they may turn out to have been right, but it will not vindicate what they have said before the facts have come out. Their unseemly behavior these past nights on TV has only lacked the torches and rope.
Once we know all the facts and Cain has made his decision whether to continue to run or drop out, I hope that somewhere in the media, there will be a serious discussion of how their handling of Herman Cain compares with their handling of Bill Clinton and John Edwards. Once Politico broke this story, the media-led by MSNBC- has been all over this like lions carving up a zebra. In the case of Edwards, the mainstream media not only ignored the story-which was broken by the National Enquirer of all people- but ran from it, indeed, had to be chased down the street by it no less. To this day, the media has soft-peddled this story as Edwards has piled one lie on top of another until the last lie is revealed, and on he goes.
It may very well turn out that Cain is not fit to be president of the United States. Yet, haven't we set the bar pretty low after the Clinton affair(s)? Once we know everything that Herman Cain has done during his life, how will it stack up against what is known about Mr Clinton or what has been alleged by other women?
And, of course, there is always that nasty little race issue hanging out there. Is Herman Cain being treated this way because he is a black man, as some are saying? Or is it deeper than that? Is it because he is a conservative black man? It is here that I am tempted to play the race card. I fervently believe that black conservatives represent a special threat to the liberal establishment. The threat is that they are an example of a black person who can succeed in America through his or her own talent, hard work, intelligence, initiative or what have you without depending on the benevolence of the white left and the victicrat activism of the Jesse Jacksons and Al Sharptons. It is driving the left crazy that conservatives and Tea Party types have embraced Herman Cain thus putting the lie to the canard that they are racists. Now the left is reduced to charging that Cain is some sort of showcase you-know-what for the Tea Party. It is all beyond disgusting. Do I think there is a heightened vitriol at work here because Cain happens to be a black conservative? Frankly, I do. Those two words ("black" and "conservative") are a volatile mixture. Put them together and you have something quite different from a John Edwards or Bill Clinton, both of whom I (still) believe are guilty of far worse sins than Herman Cain.
Anyway, that's how I see it today. A few days from now, I may be lambasting Mr. Cain, but who cares? After all, I am not MSNBC.
Having said that, I think it is still important to point out that at this point, we still do not know who his accusers are, nor do we know what the specific acts are which he has been accused of. That has not stopped the mob at MSNBC from convicting him on air every night. In the end, they may turn out to have been right, but it will not vindicate what they have said before the facts have come out. Their unseemly behavior these past nights on TV has only lacked the torches and rope.
Once we know all the facts and Cain has made his decision whether to continue to run or drop out, I hope that somewhere in the media, there will be a serious discussion of how their handling of Herman Cain compares with their handling of Bill Clinton and John Edwards. Once Politico broke this story, the media-led by MSNBC- has been all over this like lions carving up a zebra. In the case of Edwards, the mainstream media not only ignored the story-which was broken by the National Enquirer of all people- but ran from it, indeed, had to be chased down the street by it no less. To this day, the media has soft-peddled this story as Edwards has piled one lie on top of another until the last lie is revealed, and on he goes.
It may very well turn out that Cain is not fit to be president of the United States. Yet, haven't we set the bar pretty low after the Clinton affair(s)? Once we know everything that Herman Cain has done during his life, how will it stack up against what is known about Mr Clinton or what has been alleged by other women?
And, of course, there is always that nasty little race issue hanging out there. Is Herman Cain being treated this way because he is a black man, as some are saying? Or is it deeper than that? Is it because he is a conservative black man? It is here that I am tempted to play the race card. I fervently believe that black conservatives represent a special threat to the liberal establishment. The threat is that they are an example of a black person who can succeed in America through his or her own talent, hard work, intelligence, initiative or what have you without depending on the benevolence of the white left and the victicrat activism of the Jesse Jacksons and Al Sharptons. It is driving the left crazy that conservatives and Tea Party types have embraced Herman Cain thus putting the lie to the canard that they are racists. Now the left is reduced to charging that Cain is some sort of showcase you-know-what for the Tea Party. It is all beyond disgusting. Do I think there is a heightened vitriol at work here because Cain happens to be a black conservative? Frankly, I do. Those two words ("black" and "conservative") are a volatile mixture. Put them together and you have something quite different from a John Edwards or Bill Clinton, both of whom I (still) believe are guilty of far worse sins than Herman Cain.
Anyway, that's how I see it today. A few days from now, I may be lambasting Mr. Cain, but who cares? After all, I am not MSNBC.
Article on Tammi Rossman-Benjamin of UC Santa Cruz
University of California at Santa Cruz (Home of the Banana Slugs)
America's Wackiest University
Campus Watch has posted an article on my friend and colleague Tammi Rossman-Benjamin, who teaches at UC Santa Cruz (America's Wackiest University). I have often posted articles thast Tammi has written on the situation at UCSC andf other UC campuses. Accordingly, I am happy to cross-post this one.
http://www.campus-watch.org/article/id/11846
"On the third floor of the Baskin engineering building at U.C. Santa Cruz, Tammi Rossman-Benjamin is going over points of Hebrew grammar.
Her 25 students in first-level Hebrew — a panoply of African Americans, Latinos, Asians and whites — are calling out the gender associations of Hebrew words Rossman-Benjamin is reading from her notes. Some words, like "father" and "brother," are easy to remember; they are grammatically masculine. Others, like "door" and "window," just have to be memorized.
"It's pretty random," Rossman-Benjamin, a lecturer in Hebrew language at U.C. Santa Cruz, tells her students. "The way to know is its form, how it looks."
For the past 10 years, Rossman-Benjamin has been following that same directive with single-minded determination: Focusing on "form" and "how it looks," she has been tracking incidents of anti-Israel activity at this coastal campus.
Perhaps in isolation, the incidents she tracks might be considered legitimate stands against the Jewish state, even when the criticism is harsh, as it often is.
But when looked at together — the anti-Zionism, the demonization of Israel and Israeli leaders, the comparisons to Nazi Germany, the questioning of the Jewish state's legitimacy — Rossman-Benjamin says they take the form of something more insidious: a sustained, inaccurate and hateful assault on a core aspect of Jewish identity.
Such rhetoric has been present on California college campuses for years, raising recent concerns most notably at San Francisco State University, U.C. Berkeley and U.C. Irvine. The effect of the rhetoric, she and her allies claim, has been manyfold — from harming the well-being of Jewish students to impacting the integrity of academic discourse on the Middle East.
At U.C. Santa Cruz, as on other campuses, a combination of activist student groups and left-leaning academic departments has subjected Israel to withering censure — harsher treatment, critics say, than is meted out to any other nation.
So far at Santa Cruz there have been no claims of anti-Jewish violence or harassment, as have been alleged at other schools. Still, Rossman-Benjamin contends that the consequence of this rhetoric has seeped beyond the confines of debate, submerging Jewish students in an atmosphere of hostility and intimidation that no other campus group is forced to endure.
"Here, the problem has to do with faculty and administration who misuse their classrooms and university-sponsored events in order to promote their personal political agendas," Rossman-Benjamin said. "My complaint isn't about anti-Semitism. My complaint is about a hostile environment for Jewish students."
Since 2001, Rossman-Benjamin's repeated appeals to the university have been met with silence or dismissal. So in 2009, she lodged a landmark complaint with the U.S. Department of Education alleging that the atmosphere on her campus is so hostile that Jewish students suffer discrimination as a result.
In March of this year, the San Francisco division of the department's Office for Civil Rights announced that it had opened an investigation of U.C. Santa Cruz.
She has also taken her concerns all the way up the university chain of command to Mark Yudof, the U.C. president. In September, she helped organize a letter to Yudof — urging him to address anti-Jewish bigotry on U.C. campuses — that included more than 5,000 signatures. Yudof responded at length in October, describing efforts on several fronts to improve the campus climate, but insisting that the university is limited when it comes to controlling the content of speech. In a subsequent letter and press release, Rossman-Benjamin dismissed Yudof's efforts as "wholly inadequate."
Such activism has made Rossman-Benjamin, 55, something of a pariah on campus.
Not a single member of the Santa Cruz faculty has endorsed her read on the situation — save for her husband, professor Ilan Benjamin, who chairs the chemistry department. Several have accused her of intimidation and of infringing on their academic freedom.
Even in the Jewish world, she has proven divisive.
For example, the Jewish Council for Public Affairs recently was considering a resolution warning Jewish organizations against using legal means to "censor" perceived anti-Israel activities on campus. On Oct. 24, the JCPA board backed off voting on that controversial resolution until at least May, but it did urge caution in using federal civil rights laws for combating anti-Israel campus events.
Rossman-Benjamin remains not only unbowed, but as committed as ever.
Bruce Thompson, a historian at U.C. Santa Cruz, had this to say about his fellow member of the Jewish Studies faculty: "The great sociologist Max Weber made a famous distinction between an ethic of conviction and an ethic of responsibility, between leaders who search for modest, pragmatic solutions that will work, and those who start from conviction and worry about the constraints and consequences later. Tammi is obviously a person who starts from conscience."
Friends describe Rossman-Benjamin as driven, a woman of deep conviction and high principle, unafraid to defy opponents and go it alone when she feels a larger purpose at stake.
Since arriving in Santa Cruz in 1989, she has founded a Conservative congregation (when the local Reform synagogue no longer suited her), tried unsuccessfully to start a Jewish day school (opposition came from some quarters of the local community), and publicly confronted the United Synagogue of Conservative Judaism over the movement's lack of commitment to traditional biblical understanding.
Inevitably, she has stepped on some toes.
"There are people in town who really don't like Tammi, many of them at the university," said Angela Eisenpress, a friend of Rossman-Benjamin's who worked with her on the day school project.
Rossman-Benjamin was born and raised in a Conservative family outside of Philadelphia. She studied literature at McGill University in Montreal and earned a master's in applied linguistics from Concordia University in Montreal. At 25, she arrived in Israel on what was supposed to be a trip around the world teaching English and wound up staying three years.
It was 1982 and the Lebanon War was raging, but Rossman-Benjamin said she doesn't recall being particularly affected by the hostilities, or by the massacres of Palestinian refugees at the Sabra and Shatila refugee camps in Beirut. She spent time at Kibbutz Hazorea in the Jezreel Valley, then moved to Jerusalem to teach at the Hebrew University, where Ilan was pursuing his doctorate. They married in 1983.
He went on to do postdoctoral work at the University of Pennsylvania, and Rossman-Benjamin enrolled there in a graduate course in psychology. Benjamin's second postdoctoral posting brought them to San Diego, where their twin sons were born. In 1989, he was appointed to the faculty at U.C. Santa Cruz, so he and his wife moved the family 450 miles to the north.
At the time, there was a single synagogue serving Santa Cruz, Reform Temple Beth El, now of Aptos but then located in Santa Cruz. Rossman-Benjamin became an active member, serving on the board and teaching b'nai mitzvah classes. But as her sons got older, she began to worry about their Jewish education.
"I was growing, too, as a Jew," she said. "And when you have kids, the things that you can settle for you don't want your kids to settle for."
She joined Eisenpress and others to seek funding to start a school at Beth El. When the group fell short of the numbers necessary to make the school a reality, Rossman-Benjamin instead turned her attention to starting a synagogue. In 1994, 15 families founded Kol Tefillah, a Conservative-affiliated congregation that meets in an office building. Rossman-Benjamin headed up the religious school and Ilan served as president for eight years. Each Saturday, the couple continues to make the 21⁄2-mile walk to attend services.
"[Tammi] ignores the naysayers," said Eisenpress' husband, Eli, also a member of Kol Tefillah. "She doesn't have any particular interest in being popular in all segments of the community or finding other people who support her ideas before she goes ahead."
That kind of commitment, rather than a particular political identification, is what Rossman-Benjamin said animates her campaign on campus. Israel is central to her religious identity. For her, vicious attacks on its right to exist are not just abstract academic discussions; they are tantamount to attacks on her Jewishness.
"I don't separate my Zionism from my Judaism," Rossman-Benjamin said. "What it means to be a Jew is to have a love and a connection for Israel. It's a part of my identity."
In 2001, Rossman-Benjamin began noting activity at U.C. Santa Cruz hostile to Israel. Some examples she has cited:
• A flyer for one event depicted a jet with a Star of David dropping bombs on civilians.
• Eight university departments were listed as co-sponsors of a 2007 conference that Rossman-Benjamin said was "replete with gross misrepresentations of the facts, selected half-truths and numerous unsubstantiated claims." Among them: Israel is racist, apartheid and comparable to Nazi Germany.
• "Occupation 101, " a film she claims is filled with lies and distortions, was screened and followed by a panel discussion in 2009.
• The syllabus for a course taught by a self-described anti-Israel activist included readings that all took an anti-Israel perspective.
• In June 2011, "Teach-in on Islamophobia" included speakers who were known for their anti-Israel animus and activism, blamed the Jews for Islamophobia and used language that demonized the Jewish state and Jews. At a table at the event, a U.C. Santa Cruz professor handed out a letter encouraging students to endorse a U.S. boat that was part of an attempt to break Israel's naval blockade of Gaza.
After failing to get responses to many of her complaints, Rossman-Benjamin and her husband appealed to the academic senate, but a committee report on the matter, released in 2008, concluded that Middle East–related events on campus did not constitute threats to the academic integrity of the university. Several professors reported to the committee that Rossman-Benjamin's activities were intimidating faculty and posed a threat to academic freedom.
None of those professors agreed to comment for this story.
Undeterred, in 2009 Rossman-Benjamin took her appeal to the federal government. Capitalizing on a policy change that afforded Jews protection under Title VI, a provision of the 1964 Civil Rights Act that prohibits recipients of federal funding from discriminating on the basis of race, color or national origin, Rossman-Benjamin submitted a 29-page letter to the Office of Civil Rights detailing years of anti-Israel activity at U.C. Santa Cruz.
The letter said, in part: "The anti-Israel discourse and behavior in classrooms and at departmentally and college-sponsored events at UCSC is tantamount to institutional discrimination against Jewish students, which has resulted in their intellectual and emotional harassment and intimidation, and has adversely affected their educational experience at the university."
OCR has said nothing publicly about the complaint. It is unclear whether and how the claims are being investigated and when a conclusion might be reached. But Rossman-Benjamin said that even if her claims are found wanting, the investigation "brings a certain kind of scrutiny to the situation" and her efforts will have been worth it.
"I feel like I'm the strongest one, as an individual, to make the case that I make," she said. "I'm not doing this with an organizational agenda. I'm not doing this even from a position of strength. I'm doing this with everything to lose."
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It goes without saying that I support Tammi and her positions. I've witnessed the same garbage down here at UC Irvine for years. It surprises me not in the least that she gets no support from other faculty. That's why UCSC is "America's Wackiest University". Nor does it surprise me that Tammi has met opposition from within the Jewish community. I've encountered down here in Orange County. Let's just say there are too many vested interests at stake for some even when it comes to dealing with anti-Semitism. I'm still scratching my head at it all as a Gentile.
For all the talk on the left about "speaking truth to power", when it comes to academia, the left wields the power, and it takes courage for Tammi to do what she does on that campus. She not only has to stand up to the radical, pro-Palestinian forces on campus, but also to the far-left, fuzzy-haired academics and the hide-under-the-desk administrators. Add that to the fact that the media won't say anything that goes against political correctness, plus the fact that major Jewish organizations don't want to rock the boat on UC campuses. And UC President Mark Yudof?

It must feel like a lonely battle, indeed.
Give 'em Hell, Tammi!
America's Wackiest University
Campus Watch has posted an article on my friend and colleague Tammi Rossman-Benjamin, who teaches at UC Santa Cruz (America's Wackiest University). I have often posted articles thast Tammi has written on the situation at UCSC andf other UC campuses. Accordingly, I am happy to cross-post this one.
http://www.campus-watch.org/article/id/11846
"On the third floor of the Baskin engineering building at U.C. Santa Cruz, Tammi Rossman-Benjamin is going over points of Hebrew grammar.
Her 25 students in first-level Hebrew — a panoply of African Americans, Latinos, Asians and whites — are calling out the gender associations of Hebrew words Rossman-Benjamin is reading from her notes. Some words, like "father" and "brother," are easy to remember; they are grammatically masculine. Others, like "door" and "window," just have to be memorized.
"It's pretty random," Rossman-Benjamin, a lecturer in Hebrew language at U.C. Santa Cruz, tells her students. "The way to know is its form, how it looks."
For the past 10 years, Rossman-Benjamin has been following that same directive with single-minded determination: Focusing on "form" and "how it looks," she has been tracking incidents of anti-Israel activity at this coastal campus.
Perhaps in isolation, the incidents she tracks might be considered legitimate stands against the Jewish state, even when the criticism is harsh, as it often is.
But when looked at together — the anti-Zionism, the demonization of Israel and Israeli leaders, the comparisons to Nazi Germany, the questioning of the Jewish state's legitimacy — Rossman-Benjamin says they take the form of something more insidious: a sustained, inaccurate and hateful assault on a core aspect of Jewish identity.
Such rhetoric has been present on California college campuses for years, raising recent concerns most notably at San Francisco State University, U.C. Berkeley and U.C. Irvine. The effect of the rhetoric, she and her allies claim, has been manyfold — from harming the well-being of Jewish students to impacting the integrity of academic discourse on the Middle East.
At U.C. Santa Cruz, as on other campuses, a combination of activist student groups and left-leaning academic departments has subjected Israel to withering censure — harsher treatment, critics say, than is meted out to any other nation.
So far at Santa Cruz there have been no claims of anti-Jewish violence or harassment, as have been alleged at other schools. Still, Rossman-Benjamin contends that the consequence of this rhetoric has seeped beyond the confines of debate, submerging Jewish students in an atmosphere of hostility and intimidation that no other campus group is forced to endure.
"Here, the problem has to do with faculty and administration who misuse their classrooms and university-sponsored events in order to promote their personal political agendas," Rossman-Benjamin said. "My complaint isn't about anti-Semitism. My complaint is about a hostile environment for Jewish students."
Since 2001, Rossman-Benjamin's repeated appeals to the university have been met with silence or dismissal. So in 2009, she lodged a landmark complaint with the U.S. Department of Education alleging that the atmosphere on her campus is so hostile that Jewish students suffer discrimination as a result.
In March of this year, the San Francisco division of the department's Office for Civil Rights announced that it had opened an investigation of U.C. Santa Cruz.
She has also taken her concerns all the way up the university chain of command to Mark Yudof, the U.C. president. In September, she helped organize a letter to Yudof — urging him to address anti-Jewish bigotry on U.C. campuses — that included more than 5,000 signatures. Yudof responded at length in October, describing efforts on several fronts to improve the campus climate, but insisting that the university is limited when it comes to controlling the content of speech. In a subsequent letter and press release, Rossman-Benjamin dismissed Yudof's efforts as "wholly inadequate."
Such activism has made Rossman-Benjamin, 55, something of a pariah on campus.
Not a single member of the Santa Cruz faculty has endorsed her read on the situation — save for her husband, professor Ilan Benjamin, who chairs the chemistry department. Several have accused her of intimidation and of infringing on their academic freedom.
Even in the Jewish world, she has proven divisive.
For example, the Jewish Council for Public Affairs recently was considering a resolution warning Jewish organizations against using legal means to "censor" perceived anti-Israel activities on campus. On Oct. 24, the JCPA board backed off voting on that controversial resolution until at least May, but it did urge caution in using federal civil rights laws for combating anti-Israel campus events.
Rossman-Benjamin remains not only unbowed, but as committed as ever.
Bruce Thompson, a historian at U.C. Santa Cruz, had this to say about his fellow member of the Jewish Studies faculty: "The great sociologist Max Weber made a famous distinction between an ethic of conviction and an ethic of responsibility, between leaders who search for modest, pragmatic solutions that will work, and those who start from conviction and worry about the constraints and consequences later. Tammi is obviously a person who starts from conscience."
Friends describe Rossman-Benjamin as driven, a woman of deep conviction and high principle, unafraid to defy opponents and go it alone when she feels a larger purpose at stake.
Since arriving in Santa Cruz in 1989, she has founded a Conservative congregation (when the local Reform synagogue no longer suited her), tried unsuccessfully to start a Jewish day school (opposition came from some quarters of the local community), and publicly confronted the United Synagogue of Conservative Judaism over the movement's lack of commitment to traditional biblical understanding.
Inevitably, she has stepped on some toes.
"There are people in town who really don't like Tammi, many of them at the university," said Angela Eisenpress, a friend of Rossman-Benjamin's who worked with her on the day school project.
Rossman-Benjamin was born and raised in a Conservative family outside of Philadelphia. She studied literature at McGill University in Montreal and earned a master's in applied linguistics from Concordia University in Montreal. At 25, she arrived in Israel on what was supposed to be a trip around the world teaching English and wound up staying three years.
It was 1982 and the Lebanon War was raging, but Rossman-Benjamin said she doesn't recall being particularly affected by the hostilities, or by the massacres of Palestinian refugees at the Sabra and Shatila refugee camps in Beirut. She spent time at Kibbutz Hazorea in the Jezreel Valley, then moved to Jerusalem to teach at the Hebrew University, where Ilan was pursuing his doctorate. They married in 1983.
He went on to do postdoctoral work at the University of Pennsylvania, and Rossman-Benjamin enrolled there in a graduate course in psychology. Benjamin's second postdoctoral posting brought them to San Diego, where their twin sons were born. In 1989, he was appointed to the faculty at U.C. Santa Cruz, so he and his wife moved the family 450 miles to the north.
At the time, there was a single synagogue serving Santa Cruz, Reform Temple Beth El, now of Aptos but then located in Santa Cruz. Rossman-Benjamin became an active member, serving on the board and teaching b'nai mitzvah classes. But as her sons got older, she began to worry about their Jewish education.
"I was growing, too, as a Jew," she said. "And when you have kids, the things that you can settle for you don't want your kids to settle for."
She joined Eisenpress and others to seek funding to start a school at Beth El. When the group fell short of the numbers necessary to make the school a reality, Rossman-Benjamin instead turned her attention to starting a synagogue. In 1994, 15 families founded Kol Tefillah, a Conservative-affiliated congregation that meets in an office building. Rossman-Benjamin headed up the religious school and Ilan served as president for eight years. Each Saturday, the couple continues to make the 21⁄2-mile walk to attend services.
"[Tammi] ignores the naysayers," said Eisenpress' husband, Eli, also a member of Kol Tefillah. "She doesn't have any particular interest in being popular in all segments of the community or finding other people who support her ideas before she goes ahead."
That kind of commitment, rather than a particular political identification, is what Rossman-Benjamin said animates her campaign on campus. Israel is central to her religious identity. For her, vicious attacks on its right to exist are not just abstract academic discussions; they are tantamount to attacks on her Jewishness.
"I don't separate my Zionism from my Judaism," Rossman-Benjamin said. "What it means to be a Jew is to have a love and a connection for Israel. It's a part of my identity."
In 2001, Rossman-Benjamin began noting activity at U.C. Santa Cruz hostile to Israel. Some examples she has cited:
• A flyer for one event depicted a jet with a Star of David dropping bombs on civilians.
• Eight university departments were listed as co-sponsors of a 2007 conference that Rossman-Benjamin said was "replete with gross misrepresentations of the facts, selected half-truths and numerous unsubstantiated claims." Among them: Israel is racist, apartheid and comparable to Nazi Germany.
• "Occupation 101, " a film she claims is filled with lies and distortions, was screened and followed by a panel discussion in 2009.
• The syllabus for a course taught by a self-described anti-Israel activist included readings that all took an anti-Israel perspective.
• In June 2011, "Teach-in on Islamophobia" included speakers who were known for their anti-Israel animus and activism, blamed the Jews for Islamophobia and used language that demonized the Jewish state and Jews. At a table at the event, a U.C. Santa Cruz professor handed out a letter encouraging students to endorse a U.S. boat that was part of an attempt to break Israel's naval blockade of Gaza.
After failing to get responses to many of her complaints, Rossman-Benjamin and her husband appealed to the academic senate, but a committee report on the matter, released in 2008, concluded that Middle East–related events on campus did not constitute threats to the academic integrity of the university. Several professors reported to the committee that Rossman-Benjamin's activities were intimidating faculty and posed a threat to academic freedom.
None of those professors agreed to comment for this story.
Undeterred, in 2009 Rossman-Benjamin took her appeal to the federal government. Capitalizing on a policy change that afforded Jews protection under Title VI, a provision of the 1964 Civil Rights Act that prohibits recipients of federal funding from discriminating on the basis of race, color or national origin, Rossman-Benjamin submitted a 29-page letter to the Office of Civil Rights detailing years of anti-Israel activity at U.C. Santa Cruz.
The letter said, in part: "The anti-Israel discourse and behavior in classrooms and at departmentally and college-sponsored events at UCSC is tantamount to institutional discrimination against Jewish students, which has resulted in their intellectual and emotional harassment and intimidation, and has adversely affected their educational experience at the university."
OCR has said nothing publicly about the complaint. It is unclear whether and how the claims are being investigated and when a conclusion might be reached. But Rossman-Benjamin said that even if her claims are found wanting, the investigation "brings a certain kind of scrutiny to the situation" and her efforts will have been worth it.
"I feel like I'm the strongest one, as an individual, to make the case that I make," she said. "I'm not doing this with an organizational agenda. I'm not doing this even from a position of strength. I'm doing this with everything to lose."
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It goes without saying that I support Tammi and her positions. I've witnessed the same garbage down here at UC Irvine for years. It surprises me not in the least that she gets no support from other faculty. That's why UCSC is "America's Wackiest University". Nor does it surprise me that Tammi has met opposition from within the Jewish community. I've encountered down here in Orange County. Let's just say there are too many vested interests at stake for some even when it comes to dealing with anti-Semitism. I'm still scratching my head at it all as a Gentile.
For all the talk on the left about "speaking truth to power", when it comes to academia, the left wields the power, and it takes courage for Tammi to do what she does on that campus. She not only has to stand up to the radical, pro-Palestinian forces on campus, but also to the far-left, fuzzy-haired academics and the hide-under-the-desk administrators. Add that to the fact that the media won't say anything that goes against political correctness, plus the fact that major Jewish organizations don't want to rock the boat on UC campuses. And UC President Mark Yudof?

It must feel like a lonely battle, indeed.
Give 'em Hell, Tammi!
Pat Condell on Useful Idiots for Palestine
British comedian and commentator Pat Condell takes no prisoners when he describes the Jew-hatred endemic within the pro-Palestinian camp.
Can we have an open and two-sided discussion on what Mr Condell says? It is certainly thought-provoking. I invite my Muslim readers ( I know you are out there.) to weigh in.
Can we have an open and two-sided discussion on what Mr Condell says? It is certainly thought-provoking. I invite my Muslim readers ( I know you are out there.) to weigh in.
Friday, November 4, 2011
Chris Matthews Has All the Facts on Herman Cain
(Hat tip to Media Research Center)
"I think he's struggling to come up with some rationale why he's not talking....At some point we're going to find out, maybe by the end of the week, what he actually did that caused all of this trouble. He clearly did something wrong."
The tribunal at MSNBC has pretty much convicted Herman Cain. We already know what Ed "Butter and Egg Man" Schultz thinks. We know what Lawrence O'Donnell thinks. He's ready to put "his personal fortune" on the line to support the accusers if they will come forward and lay it out. And Chris Matthews? Here is what he told Matt Lauer on Wednesday:
(Media Research Center)
Keep in mind that we still don't know who the accusers are, and we still don't know what the specific allegations are.
Fair and balanced?
"I think he's struggling to come up with some rationale why he's not talking....At some point we're going to find out, maybe by the end of the week, what he actually did that caused all of this trouble. He clearly did something wrong."
The tribunal at MSNBC has pretty much convicted Herman Cain. We already know what Ed "Butter and Egg Man" Schultz thinks. We know what Lawrence O'Donnell thinks. He's ready to put "his personal fortune" on the line to support the accusers if they will come forward and lay it out. And Chris Matthews? Here is what he told Matt Lauer on Wednesday:
(Media Research Center)
Keep in mind that we still don't know who the accusers are, and we still don't know what the specific allegations are.
Fair and balanced?
CAIR and Anwar Awlaki
Nihad Awad, the CEO of CAIR, is running this statement on the CAIR website regarding Anwar Awlaki.
http://www.cair.com/ArticleDetails.aspx?ArticleID=26883&&name=n&&currPage=1
Not so fast, Mr Awad. The associations between Awlaki and CAIR have long been documented.
http://garyfouse.blogspot.com/2011/09/cairs-careful-statement-on-killing-of.html
It's easy to dismiss Awlaki as a bad guy while lamenting the fact that our military took him out in a war situation, but the fact is that Awlaki, CAIR, Awad, and all these other questionable groups and figures are swimming in the same lake. They know each other: they work with each other; and they have the same goals-to tear down this country and replace it with an Islamic caliphate-even if it takes a hundred years.
Recently, a poll indicated that only 11% of American Muslims identify with CAIR. That is a positive sign. They know what it is like to live "in the old country". I think most of them prefer to keep things the way they are here. I would guess that secretly, most of them wish CAIR would disappear.
http://www.cair.com/ArticleDetails.aspx?ArticleID=26883&&name=n&&currPage=1
Not so fast, Mr Awad. The associations between Awlaki and CAIR have long been documented.
http://garyfouse.blogspot.com/2011/09/cairs-careful-statement-on-killing-of.html
It's easy to dismiss Awlaki as a bad guy while lamenting the fact that our military took him out in a war situation, but the fact is that Awlaki, CAIR, Awad, and all these other questionable groups and figures are swimming in the same lake. They know each other: they work with each other; and they have the same goals-to tear down this country and replace it with an Islamic caliphate-even if it takes a hundred years.
Recently, a poll indicated that only 11% of American Muslims identify with CAIR. That is a positive sign. They know what it is like to live "in the old country". I think most of them prefer to keep things the way they are here. I would guess that secretly, most of them wish CAIR would disappear.
Does NY Have a Mayor?
Zuccotti Park in fall
As the tents, trash, feces, urine and assaults pile up in New York's Zuccotti Park and more workers are being laid off by businesses in the area, the question begs: When will New York's mayor, Michael Bloomberg say that enough is enough and have the loiterers cleared out and/or charged with loitering?
A wider question might be what the Hell does this guy Bloomberg do day in and day out?
This is the same guy that declared that the recent 9-11 10-year commemoration would not have room for first responders. This is the same guy that decided there would be no religious participation, no clergy involved. We all know the reason for that.
So now, New York City is graced by the presence of a bunch of grifters who have decided they don't like Wall Street or some such nonsense. Therefore, they have taken over a city park, which I presume had heretofore been used by families to walk their dogs, let their children run and play or simply take a walk. No more.
"Whose park?"
"Our park."
"Whose city?"
"Our city."
Indeed. What say you, Mr Mayor?
Deadbeat Congresswoman Laura Richardson Back in News
Representative Laura Richardson (D-CA)
Deadbeat
California's deadbeat congresswoman Laura Richardson is back in the news again. As always, it's because she has (allegedly) done something bad. While in California politics, Richardson was known for her failure to pay her mortgage on various houses she owned. Accordingly, Richardson has previously graced the pages of Fousesquawk.
http://garyfouse.blogspot.com/2008/08/deadbeat-congresswoman-meet-laura.html
Now she is accused of using congressioanl aides to work on her campaign on government time using government resources.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/11/04/house-ethics-panel-to-fully-probe-congresswoman-accused-campaign-misconduct/
Of course, Richardson pulled out the race card implying that she is only being investigated by the Ethics Committee because she is black. (Try being a black conservative, Laura.)
ACORN and Occupy Wall Street
The below Fox report documents this revamped ACORN operation known as NYCC and how it has participated in Occupy Wall Street.
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2011/11/03/acorn-officials-scramble-firing-workers-and-shredding-documents-after-exposed/?test=latestnews
They are still out there, folks. They are working for the Occupy movement, and come nect year, they will be working for the re-election of President Obama.
By any means necessary.
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2011/11/03/acorn-officials-scramble-firing-workers-and-shredding-documents-after-exposed/?test=latestnews
They are still out there, folks. They are working for the Occupy movement, and come nect year, they will be working for the re-election of President Obama.
By any means necessary.
Mourning the Passing of a DEA Comrade
There is an old German tune played at military funerals called "Ich hatt' einen Kameraden" (I had a comrade). It came to mind this past week when we learned that Tom DeTriquet had passed away suddenly at 66 in his home in northern Virginia. Tom, like me, was a retired DEA agent. We served together in Bangkok in the late 1970s, and as I recall, he was born one day later than I.
Originally from the New York-New Jersey area, Tom was of French-Italian extraction, but he identified more with his French side. He learned to speak the language, and he appreciated French culture, food and wine.
He was also a Viet Nam combat veteran, a Marine captain, no less. Coincidentally, he married a Vietnamese woman, Thieu, a saint of a woman who was with him till the end.
Tom and I first met in Los Angeles, where he (already stationed in Bangkok) was passing through while I was awaiting orders to transfer there. Early on in Bangkok, we had an angry disagreement over a work-related issue, but it passed.
During our tour in Bangkok, we experienced a tragedy in our office when Bob Lightfoot, a young fellow agent, accidentally shot himself when his weapon dropped off his desk onto the floor and discharged. Tom was the first to reach him and took charge of getting medical help on the scene. Bob died a couple of hours later in the hospital. It was a tragedy that Tom, I and others personally experiened.
After our time in Thailand ended, Tom and I went on to many different postings. He went to Phoenix, Pakistan, El Salvador, Puerto Rico, and, of course Hqs. Our paths would cross from time to time, either in the Washington area, Phoenix, San Francisco, or New York. I always enjoyed those times together sharing food, drinks, war stories, and jokes. Late in his career, Tom participated in Operation Snowcap, a dangerous, long-term venture in South America, aimed at locating and destroyintg cocaine labs in coordination with our South American colleagues. He was older and didn't have to volunteer for such a high-risk, physically demanding job, but that's the way Tom was.
Like so many law enforcement types from the New York area, Tom was a great raconteur and master of the one-liners. He told a story of traveling to Paris for three days with a Thai Customs official. For Tom, it was a dream come true, and he looked forward to dining on French food and drinking French wine. On their first night in town, they were walking down the Champs d'Elysees looking for a place to have dinner. They passed a Chinese restaurant, and his colleague suggested Chinese food. Gritting his teeth, Tom decided to be diplomatic and give in to his friend's request on the first night. The following evening, when they were discussing where to eat, the Thai Customs officer, said, "Tom, remember that place we ate last night?" Suffice to say, Tom ate Chinese every night in Paris (or so the story went.)
Tom was a good man who served his country well, and it's unfortunate that he, like many others, couldn't enjoy a longer retirement. He leaves behind a son, who attended the Citadel and is also serving his country, a daughter and his wife's younger sister, whom he adopted. His burial will be this coming Monday at Arlington National Cemetery.
When I look back on my association with people like Tom DeTriquet, I realize that of all the things I have done in life, that which I am most proud of is having been a DEA agent.
Farewell, my comrade.
Thursday, November 3, 2011
Occupy Oakland and MSNBC
"God bless them. "
-Nancy Pelosi
Has anyone told the mad-hatters at MSNBC what those Occupy Oakland protesters they are glorifying are actually up to?
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2011/11/02/occupy-oakland-protesters-target-busy-port/
Actually, someone has. Here is Rachel Maddow and her labororious and sympathetic report on the Oakland "general strike" (Huffington Post).
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/11/03/rachel-maddow-occupy-oakland-general-strike_n_1073475.html
Here is a Reuters report on what occurred last night in Oakland.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/11/04/us-usa-protests-oakland-idUSTRE7A06KH20111104
Eighty arrests. The port shut down. Businesses forced to close. And here we have one of the major broadcast networks in America standing in solidarity with this crap. Maddow proudly showed us images of stores with signs proclaiming that they stood in solidarity with the 99% movement-or were closed in support of it. How many of those stores put those signs in their windows and closed up shop hoping their windows would not be smashed?
I watch these idiots on MSNBC defending this stuff, and I just shake my head in amazement.
God help the Republic.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




