This article first appeared in New English Review.
In the wake of the horrific attack in March on a Nashville
Christian school in which three children and three adults were slaughtered by a
woman named Audrey Hale, who identified as a transgender, the Nashville police
have decided they will not release the contents of Hale’s so-called manifesto
to the public. There is no legal reason not to do so. Hale is dead thus, there
is no evidentiary or fair trial issue here. It appears the contents of the
manifesto are so bad that authorities fear it might inspire others to commit
similar acts. If that is the case, at least, they could explain to the public
what the motivation was for Hale to attack that particular school. Was this a
hate crime against Christians? Did Hale’s identity as a transgender play any
role?
This reminds me of what we have been seeing play out in
Europe in the past decade or so with respect to Islamic terrorism. Police,
politicians, and media are loathe to fully identify individuals who suddenly go
on a rampage attacking people, killing them or raping them. Riots are routinely
blamed on “youths” or in Germany, as people with a “southern appearance”. For all we know, that could mean pot-bellied
Bavarians in lederhosen and funny green hats. In almost every case, single
attackers are dismissed as being mentally ill. Full names of defendants are not
published until they are actually convicted. The biggest open secret in Europe
(Western Europe at least) is that millions of young, single Muslim migrants and
fake asylum-seekers are walking around in-between running amok.
Just the latest example took place in Berlin on May 3, where
a 38-year-old man identified only as Berhan S., a man with a lengthy police
record, walked onto the playground of the Evangelical School in Neukoelln (a
district in Berlin) and stabbed two schoolgirls for no reason. Both girls, ages
7 and 8, are still hospitalized as I write this, one fighting for her life.
Meanwhile, Berhan S. Is sitting in a psychiatric hospital being evaluated
(under guard, of course). The media is emphasizing that Berhan S. has a history
of not only arrests, but mental illness as well. They also stress that he was
born in Berlin and is a German citizen. But it is clear that Berhan S. comes
from an immigrant background, most likely Turkish. One daring newspaper, Tagesspiegel,
has actually published his photo (with a black line running across his eyes for
some reason and describes him and his family as “strictly religious”). It may
be too soon to jump to conclusions, but if Berhan S. is a Muslim, as I strongly
suspect he is, then I would bet the farm that his only logical motive for
choosing a Christian school was to perform an act of jihad. Let us not forget
that in recent years, Christian churches, schools, and other institutions have
suffered a rash of Islamic attacks, especially in Germany and France-to say
nothing of the Jewish communities.
Much like the Nashville incident, the Berlin case is just
the latest example of how the police and media are not serving the interest of
public safety. This is not to suggest that all Muslims are walking time bombs
or terrorists per se, but in Europe, the threat to public safety is all too
clear. I respect the fact that authorities do not want to stoke hate against
innocent Muslims, but with rare exceptions, very few acts of violence directed
at Muslims have occurred in the Western world. The most notable example was the
horrific attack on two mosques in New Zealand in 2020 by a lone killer who took
51 innocent lives. There was also the 2011 case of Anders Breivik, the
Norwegian who slaughtered over 70 people (not Muslims) to display his anger
over Muslim migration into Norway. All of that is to be condemned by decent
people. The fact remains, however, that Western Europe is no longer the safe
environment we thought it was thanks to the millions of young males from
countries like Syria, Afghanistan, the Maghreb (North Africa), and other
predominantly Muslim countries. Most of these unaccompanied males should never
have been admitted in the first place.
My point is that the public in Germany, especially the
Christian and Jewish communities, is entitled to know the motives of Berhan S.
Was he, in fact, carrying out a religiously-inspired hate crime against the
Christian community in targeting two little girls in a Christian school?
Similarly, the public in the US is entitled to know if
Audrey Hale was deliberately targeting a Christian institution as revenge for
any perceived bias or damage to the transgender community. Again, this is not
to suggest that transgenders in general are plotting to turn to terrorism to
achieve their ends, but to the extent that this community may be radicalizing
and that further attacks may be possible, the public is entitled to know the
dangers and risks. But if people in places like Nashville and Berlin are denied
the facts behind these horrific attacks, then it is left to us to assume the
worst.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*Update: The German blog, Allah's willing executioners is describing Berhan S. as Turkish. It appears there are conflicting reports as to whether he was born in Turkey or Germany.
10 comments:
How come you're not asking who's radicalizing white male Boomers? How many people do they need to kill before you start to ask the same kinds of questions?
We have exactly ONE incident of a transgender person committing mass violence. The fact is that they are four times more likely to be victims of violence than non-transgender people.
I'd hate to see you working triage. "Never mind that head wound! This guy over here has hangnail!"
Cute analogy, but I think I made the point that I'm not blaming all transgenders for Nashville. But you should also ask yourself why they won't release the manifesto. There is also the possibility (which I didn't note) that investigators have found leads in her papers leading to other people now under investigation. I do hope this will prove to be an isolated case of a person gone off the rails, but when you withhold information, the public is left to draw its own conclusions. As far as what occurred in Berlin, it was no isolated incident.
I think that it's one thing to ask the question as to why they're not releasing the manifesto. It's another thing to create an entire narrative based solely on speculation. Yes, maybe there are other people now under investigation - and guess what's just as (actually, more) likely? The shooter named names of people who work at that school who have molested the children there.
Or maybe it's for a reason that neither of us is even thinking of.
But I was serious when I talked about straight white men being radicalized in this country. What about that guy who shot a black kid solely for ringing his doorbell? (Once through the door and once when the poor kid was lying on the ground.) According to the man's grandson, the guy had fallen down the right-wing media rabbit hole long ago. How about January 6th? Who radicalized those guys? I'll tell you - Sean Hannity, Tucker Carlson, and Laura Ingraham. We now have it on record that none of the three of them believed Trump's lies about the election, yet they continued to perpetuate it on their shows. (And that's why Fox had to pay up to Dominion, and likely part of the reason why they canned Carlson.)
I'm more worried about getting shot by some white guy (even though I'm white myself) with a gun fetish than I'm worried about any transgender people.
"I think that it's one thing to ask the question as to why they're not releasing the manifesto. It's another thing to create an entire narrative based solely on speculation. Yes, maybe there are other people now under investigation - and guess what's just as (actually, more) likely? The shooter named names of people who work at that school who have molested the children there.
Or maybe it's for a reason that neither of us is even thinking of."
Yes, you add another possible reason, good point, but when the public is left in the dark and not provided with something that could clarify it, you can';t blame them for speculating or making assumptions. Precisely my point.
If you think Hannity, Ingraham and Carlson are responsible for radicalizing these wacxkos that's your opinion, but they have never condoned this kind of action. Truly radicalizing someone is when you urge them to do stuff like this.
As to who you are afraid of, fine, that's your business. I am afraid of crazies too. We live in a country where you can be killed for no reason. If I were Jewish, I would fear being in a synagogue or anywhere in Europe, If I were a student in a Christian school, I would be afraid.
Why is it that every issue has to be reverted back to Trump, Fox, Hannity and Carlson?
"but when the public is left in the dark and not provided with something that could clarify it, you can';t blame them for speculating or making assumptions"
Sure, but is that the responsible thing to do? They might have good reasons for not releasing it. For instance, if there were accusations against particular individuals in the manifesto, those should be investigated before being released and ruining somebody's life (who might not even deserve it).
It's one thing to speculate privately or while talking it over with friends. But you're posting this on a public forum.
And let's be real about Jan. 6. Those people did that as a result of believing that the election was stolen. While the Fox News talking heads are hardly the only ones to have perpetuated that lie, they took part in it. And they're the ones with the largest, most mainstream, reach.
Have you been following this Dominion lawsuit at all? You know that they all privately communicated that they didn't believe that there was voter fraud, and yet when the cameras were on, they continued to feed that narrative that led to what happened.
In other words - they took part in radicalizing people.
And you'd be scared if you were a kid in a Christian school? Scared of whom?
If the manifesto contained names that were possible suspects, those portions could be blacked out. If nothing else, if they thought the entire manifesto would inspire others, they could at least tell us what the motive was, which they surely now know.
As for January 6, I have never claimed the election was stolen. I do think there was hanky panky going on in places like Philadelphia, Atlanta and Milwaukee, but I have never made any charges against Dominion. You keep coming back to Fox, Fox, Fox. Do you have an obsession with Fox?
"And you'd be scared if you were a kid in a Christian school? Scared of whom?"
Audrey Hale and Berhan S, to name a couple.
"As for January 6, I have never claimed the election was stolen. I do think there was hanky panky going on in places like Philadelphia, Atlanta and Milwaukee, but I have never made any charges against Dominion. You keep coming back to Fox, Fox, Fox. Do you have an obsession with Fox?"
Okay, let me break it down in easy to digest points:
* You're worried about people being "radicalized" based on one incident of a trans person shooting up a Christian school.
*I'm trying to tell you that even if that is true, there is a far greater problem of violence from those who have been radicalized by right-wing media, of which Fox News is a part.
*I didn't even say that you claimed the election was stolen (although you're sort of talking out both sides of your mouth by bringing up the debunked "hanky panky" in various states).
*I'm bringing up Fox because they are instrumental in radicalizing people, and part of that was furthering the lie that the election was stolen. And we know that they knew they were lying.
*I'm not even just talking about the January 6th incident. I'm talking about that old guy who shot a black kid for ringing his doorbell. I'm talking about that El Paso shooter. I'm talking about Dylan Root. Fox is not solely to blame, but with their anti-immigrant hysteria and white replacement theory talking points, they are a part of the problem.
And lastly, yes, there are people who target Christians. However, let's be real when talking about this country. Christians pose a far greater threat to transgender people (to name just one group since you brought up Audrey Hale) than transgender people have ever been a threat to them. You know those states that are banning gender-affirming treatment for young people? Do you know what the result of this will be?
Dead children.
This isn't even a debate. Kids who are given gender-affirming treatments (which does NOT mean surgery - just hormone therapy which is mostly reversible) show a drastic drop in suicide rates. Do you care about those kids?
Look, we are going around in circles here. The thesis of my post was that the public has a right to know about threats and risks to public safety. When horrific things happen, the public has a right to be informed about the motives. If you don't report it and conceal the information, people will come to their own conclusions, rightly or wrongly. Do I believe that we are facing a wave of transgender people committing acts like what happened in Nashville? No I don't. I do believe that in Western Europe, people are at definite risk of being attacked by some jihadists, which I believe the Berlin attacker was-crazy and deranged as he might be. Yet, the media there and the police routinely downplay that angle or try to bury it altogether. That is why I made the comparison between Nashville and Berlin. All this stuff you raise about Fox, white replacement theory, radicalization, and transgender issues is just a lot of noise and away from my main point. Once again, you keep beating a dead horse.
Yeah, multiple mass shootings in this country every month, the latest one in Texas by another far-right nationalist, and you're worried about trans people.
But I'm the one making "noise".
Just curious: When you read an article, do you skim it, scan it, or actually read it? I think you could read a bio of Abraham Lincoln and come away with, "Yeah, but he owned slaves".
Post a Comment