Recently, President Obama callously referred to the victims of the Paris deli massacre by a Muslim as "a bunch of folks randomly shot". Of course, we all knew that was nonsense. They were singled out and shot because they were Jewish. Now it is revealed that video footage from the killer himself confirms he intended to kill Jews.
http://www.algemeiner.com/2015/02/26/footage-shows-hyper-cacher-terrorist-kill-shopper-after-victim-revealed-he-was-jewish-2/
While Muslim extremists massacre Jews in Europe and their co-religionists in the Middle East are embarked on a campaign of genocide against Christians, we have a president who refuses to acknowledge the obvious. His White House issued a statement that the 21 Egyptian Christians who were recently beheaded in Libya were "Egyptian citizens". He won't even acknowledge Islamic extremism or Islamic terrorism. Meanwhile, while Christians in Iraq and Syria are running for their lives, the administration is bringing in thousands of Syrian Muslims as refugees. No word on the Christians. Apparently, they are being left to fend for themselves.
And to cap it off, he convenes a White House conference on Countering Violent Extremism in which he invites the head of Muslim Brotherhood-allied MPAC and the Islamic Cultural Society of Boston, the latter with a long history of extremist figures including Yusuf al Qaradawi, Tarek Mehanna (convicted terrorist), Abdur Rahman Alamoudi, convicted terrorist. Aafia Siddiqi (convicted terrorist) and the Brothers Tsarnaev of their sister mosque in Cambridge.
Does Obama understand the threat that is facing us? Or does he care?
1 comment:
I guess I am just destined to forever not get it. As Gary notes, Obama Himself, and most/all of his herd, simply refuse to use the terms "Islamic" and either "extremism" or "terrorism" in the same breath. At the same time, I am about 99.9% positive that I have heard Obama use the terms "ISIS" and/or "ISIL", and I am 100% sure I have heard at least some of his spokesholes (Gary's apt term) do the same.
Of course, the first "I" in either acronym stands for "Islamic". This means that these organization(s) and their members , which are most certainly violent/terroristic, thereby necessarily have some connection to/roots in Islam, at least in their own minds . Accordingly, the deliberate failure to admit the connection, and the refusal to call it what it is, quite adequately demonstrate not only a distinction without a difference, but GROSS duplicity as well.
And for those who insist on blathering on about how these groups do not represent "mainstream Islam", a very significant percentage, and thereby a very large number, of Muslims (hundreds of millions worldwide, at least hundreds of thousands if not a million or so in the U.S.) either support, or actually engage in, terrorist activities.
Further, I would note that as examples, it is quite obvious that neither Jim Jones (actually a left-winger/socialist of a sort) nor David Koresh nor Eric Rudolph nor Timothy McVeigh (all right-wingers, I would believe), represented "mainstream Christianity". However, they were convinced of the rightness of their particular/peculiar strain of same. Same would apply to these Muslim mopes/mutts. In all instances, injuries and death occurred and continue to occur, no matter what some insist on calling (or not calling) it.
Post a Comment