Translate


Wednesday, May 7, 2014

White House Executive Privilege on Benghazi Emails

Christmas carol

"He's beginning to look a lot like Nixon,
more and more each day..."

So now the White House is claiming executive privilege over a 7-page e-mail chain containing discussions of how to react to a Fox News report that they knew within 24 hours (actually it was much less) that the attack in Benghazi was a terrorist attack and not a protest over a video gone out of control.


http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/05/07/obama-administration-withholding-full-contents-fox-news-benghazi-report/

"The Obama administration is withholding the full contents of a "media strategy" discussion over a Fox News report on Benghazi, claiming that releasing them would have a chilling effect on their "frank deliberations."


"That's right."

Meanwhile, the Democrats in the House of Representatives are debating whether to even participate in the select committee being formed under Trey Gowdy (R-SC) to get to the bottom of the Benghazi mess, which they (Dems) are clearly not interested in seeing happen.

6 comments:

Squid said...

"At this time, what difference does it make."

"Dude, it was over two years ago."

This is the most corrupt Administration to has ever occupied the White House. Obama's legacy will not be the Affordable Care Act, it will be the most deceptive, dishonest and deceitful Presidency.

Squid

Siarlys Jenkins said...

This is the most worthless and self-serving waste of taxpayers money in search of something, anything, to resurrect a failed political device, within living memory.

What a loud-mouthed, hot-winded hoax. Why would anyone of integrity have anything to do with it?

(Note to Gary: Nobody has been burglarizing the Republican National Committee).

Gary Fouse said...

Note to Siarlys:

Nobody died in Watergate.

Siarlys Jenkins said...

Note to Gary: Ansar al Shariah wasn't dispatched from the White House and paid for by campaign funds from any major American political party.

Gary Fouse said...

Which is irrelevant.

Siarlys Jenkins said...

It is? Good, you get my point. Ergo, your observations are equally irrelevant. (Maybe you haven't figured that out.)