Eric Holder- 2011 Fousesquawk Jerk of the Year
Does the Department of Justice meet and work with the Council on American Islamic Relations or not? That is the question posed to Attorney General Eric Holder this week in Congress. As usual, Holder was evasive (as dishonest people generally are). PJMedia has the report.
http://pjmedia.com/blog/holder-says-doj-still-mingles-with-cair-in-quest-to-root-out-potential-domestic-violence-adherents/
As for that 12 million dollars given to the DOJ to research domestic radicalization, why not just pay it to Steve Emerson and he can sit down and explain it to you, Eric?
Also touched on briefly was the issue of going after the Benghazi attackers. Apparently, there is some law that prevents us from taking them out like we did Anwar Awlaki. Interesting how this administration wants to ignore federal marijuana laws in Colorado and Washington, but adheres to some vague law when it comes to those who killed our people in Benghazi.
2 comments:
Or like we did bin Laden?? I don't recall either him or Awlaki having been convicted of anything here, but I could be wrong about the latter.
More explicit reasons to impeach Holder and Obama.
Morrel's reasons for taking out the word "Islamic" is the same reason they didn't use it in the Army report on the Hassan terrorist killings at Ft. Hood.
If you don't NAME your enemy you never confront the problem. If we did in every instance in the newspapers, media, and official documents the people would see what the Islamic infiltration into this country is doing. But Obama and Holder would rather suffer bombings in Boston, civil strife over their "Islamophobia" claims,other terrorist attacks and attempts in order to be politically correct.
It seems that is what they read into their oath of office... forget that part and defending and protecting..
Post a Comment