National Security Adviser Susan Rice went on 60 minutes and told Lesley Stahl that Benghazi was a "false controversy", which she doesn't have time to think about.
http://video.foxnews.com/v/2964855246001/susan-rice-dismisses-benghazi-as-false-controversy/
Where does one begin? A US ambassador and three other embassy employees murdered by an attack on our consulate. Pleas for help denied during the attack. A false narrative about what the attack was all about. Subsequent revelations about previous requests for more security denied by the State Department. Survivors held incognito. Lies before Congress. A president and secretary of state who were missing in action.
And this woman has the gall to call this "a false controversy". How dare she? I want her to look the families of the four killed in that attack and tell them that this is a "false controversy."
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
When everyone is screaming "false narrative" it is hard to discern whether either or both are lying. One could just as well ask, how dare you keep pushing dubious scenarios from sources more interested in lobbing shells at the executive branch than in any discernible objective concern for the truth?
There is no controversy over whether four people died. There is no credible evidence that rescue efforts that were ready to roll were withheld. What is being made "controversial" is indeed not worth Susan Rice's time or anyone else's.
Rice is just another lier sitting on the LIer and Chief's Security Counsel. Lets see, there is Obama, Rice, Clapper, and Kerry (the testimony before Congress on Vietnam soldiers). Do you feel safe?
Squid
Ms. Rice uses the word "False" in her statemnet. What I say to Rice is: "falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus"
Squid
Squid is showing off both that he is bad at spelling, and that he doesn't understand Latin phrases.
Post a Comment