Translate


Monday, November 25, 2013

"Knockout" Takes on a New Aspect

Hat tip Creeping Sharia

static.squarespace.com
Amrit Marajh, 28, in custody for attacking a Jew

"Perl was wearing a yarmulke. At least one of the men in the group yelled an anti-Semitic slur, cops said."

It looks like young African-American youth are not the only ones participating in the new sport of "Knockout". Here are the details on the most recent arrest in New York City.

http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/nyc-crime/cops-probe-attack-man-brooklyn-article-1.1526514

I wonder if CAIR has any comment.

*Update from Algemeiner

It looks like in Brooklyn, Jews are the preferred target. Here is what one Jewish victim had to say about his attack.

http://www.algemeiner.com/2013/11/25/knockout-game-victim-says-jews-are-being-targeted-because-they-look-gentle/

And indifference from the mayor's office out-going and in-coming.

7 comments:

Siarlys Jenkins said...

I wonder if Mel Gibson's next movie franchise is going to be called "Knockout!" ???

Anonymous said...

Silly Gary.

Amrit Marajh is a Hindu name and not a Muslim name.

Amrit means "Immortal" in Sanskrit.

Marajh means "Great King" in Sanskrit.

Almost all muslims have Arabic first and/or last names.

Stop drinking the Jewish Kool Aid.

Gary Fouse said...

Anonymous,

Silly you for making your anti-semitism clear. Did I say the guy was a Muslim?

(Well, I did ask if CAIR had a comment.)

(Maybe this was it.)

Gary Fouse said...

PS:

Several websites are calling the perp a Muslim, but none of the MSM outlets that I have seen. Many of these sites contain reader comments stating that the name is a Hindu name. If I get clarification, I will post it.

Siarlys Jenkins said...

This reminds me of the Sikh convenience store owner in Arizona who was murdered in September 2001 by a couple of 'mericuns who thought anyone wearing a turban must be Muslim.

Gary Fouse said...

And all this time I thought Keith Ellison was a Muslim.

Gary Fouse said...

Siarlys,

You have an amazing talent for trying to debunk an argument simply by muddying the waters with no real counter-argument. You have read too many law books.