http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/britains-biggest-child-sex-grooming-2181438
The burning question is: Who are the perps? In the above article, they are only identified as "white and Asian men". (Asian in UK means those from the sub-continent, Indian-Pakistani, Bangladeshi etc.)
The below report of another case gives us a little more detail.
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/oxford-paedophile-gang-threatened-cut-2000415
Pakistani and North African origin.
In the below article, we learn about the scope of the problem in the UK.
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/child-sex-slave-gangs-every-1891898
Every city in the country.
Here's more detail on just how horrible this problem is.
As you can see, there is a reluctance from the authorities and the media to identify the perps and state what the common thread is. But there is a common thread. The men and the gangs who are carrying out these outrages are Muslims.
But why is that? There must be an explanation. The nationalities vary, but the religion does not. Is there something in Islamic doctrine that leads these men to think their actions are justified? Perhaps the below article gives us a clue.
http://unitedpatriotsworldwide.com/vinienco/2013/08/18/muslims-rape-y-k-cherson/
We cannot examine the situation of the UK in a vacuum. The problem also exists in Scandinavia, France, Holland, and other European countries. The fact of the matter is that there is a rape epidemic in Europe, and it is being carried out almost exclusively by Muslim immigrants. Yet, nobody wants to admit the truth that everybody knows.
So what can the Europeans do about it (aside from stiff prison sentences, which don't really exist)? Are they to provide more welfare and jobs to the immigrants? Are they to try and speed up assimilation? None of that is working. Perhaps, it is time to accept some unpleasant truths. They will never rid themselves of this plague until they are able to face the truth. Perhaps, the final link deserves some consideration.
7 comments:
Sex grooming goes on because there are vulnerable women to be victimized, willing customers willing to pay to assuage their lusts, and ruthless men and women willing to provide the product for monetary gain. To dwell on the ethnicity or national origin of the perps makes no more and no less sense than to dwell on the fact that Vito Genovese and Joe Valacci were Italian, Meyer Lansky was Jewish, etc. etc. etc. Yes they each gave a unique twist to their crimes, and no, the crimes are not inherent in the genes or culture, manifested by the fact that Rudy Giuliani is also Italian, and Simon Wiesenthal is also Jewish.
So you don't think it is a little disconcerting that all of these rings are run by Muslims?
Sorry, but facts are facts. The Italians were not the only ethnic group that had a criminal element, but there are no Italian sex rings in Britain.
There aren't enough impoverished Italian immigrants in Britain to generate a sex ring. What few Italians there are in Britain have better options -- and anyway, there is plenty of work back home supplying Silvio Berlusconi.
If an ethnicity is concentrated in the socio-economic demographics that make crime look good to those with a talent for it, those demographics will be disproportionately represented. Russians are more prominent in crime in the USA than Italians, because Italian immigrants grand-children have moved on, except for certain old-time communities in New York, where on a small scale you still see such things.
No, I'm not disconcerted that these rings are run by Muslims. I'm disconcerted that these rings are run at all, but crime has never been totally eradicated. Culture is relevant to infiltration and anticipating specific tactics and methods. It has no other relevance than that.
It certainly is not a valid cause for a general pogrom against the ethnicity or religious demographic referenced, and of course you are too upstanding to advocate anything of the kind, but anyone who took your column seriously would feel inspired to go out and clobber the next Muslim they saw, or even the next person with a turban they saw running a convenience store.
The amount of sex grooming and the fact that these girls have gone to the police before only leads to one conclusion:
The British police are part of the scheme. They return the girls to the men. I wonder how much money they make on the take?
The question I was was why this was so. Perhaps, the last link I posted supplied the answer. There seems to be an ideological basis for this phenomenum. Is it not worth exploring?
Anonymous,
You need to be more specific. You are talking about Catholic priests, and here I am with you. I have written about this problem a few times in the past. I have singled out Cardinal Roger Mahony of Los Angeles, and I have accused the Catholic Church with coverups. In addition, I stopped attending Catholic church several years ago over this very issue-much to the displeasure of my wife.
In short, I have condemned both, but one doesn't excuse the other.
Findalis has a good point about police on the take. This, like another of your columns, is beginning to remind me of Mickey Cohen. In the movie, at least, he had a quite ruthless sex grooming operation, targeting innocent young girls obviously fresh off the bus looking for instant stardom at Hollywood, who would fall for a handsome young man inviting them to a quiet audition on the upper floor of a nearby apartment building. Once inside the "grooming" began. And most cops were on the take.
Post a Comment