First, we have CNN's clueless Wolf Blitzer speculating on who he thought might be responsible (Hat tip Hot Air)
http://hotair.com/archives/2013/04/15/video-cnns-blitzer-indulges-in-the-irresistible-urge-to-speculate/
Then there is the ever-reliable Chris Matthews on MSNBC speculating about those people who don't like to pay their taxes. (Hat tip Daily Caller)
http://dailycaller.com/2013/04/15/chris-matthews-democratic-congressman-suggest-tax-day-tie-to-boston-attacks/
In the below link from Weasel Zippers, we have the usual Harvard professor on MSNBC speculating about the "far right".
http://weaselzippers.us/2013/04/17/msnbc-brings-on-harvard-professor-to-claim-far-right-may-be-responsible-for-boston-terror-attack/
NBC's Luke Russert thought he detected a link to Waco (Hat tip Daily Caller)
http://dailycaller.com/2013/04/15/nbc-news-reporter-luke-russert-speculates-on-waco-link-to-boston-bombing/
Next, we have the New York Times writer Nicholas Kristof blaming Senate Republicans. (Hat tip Daily Caller)
http://dailycaller.com/2013/04/15/ny-times-columnist-kristof-slams-senate-republicans-after-boston-explosions/
Barney Frank used the attack to argue for more government spending. (Hat tip Daily Caller)
http://dailycaller.com/2013/04/16/barney-frank-doubles-down-on-using-boston-attack-to-argue-for-government-spending/
And a writer for Salon.com named David Sirota fervently hoped that the bomber(s) would be white American.
http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/lets_hope_the_boston_marathon_bomber_is_a_white_american/
Sorry, Dave.
Not tax protesters
Not Tea Party
Not right-wing militiamen
Not "Patriots"
Not white racists
1 comment:
EVERYONE who ventured a predictive opinion has egg on their face.
Always looking for the suspects from the last war, never ready for who's coming out of right field this time.
Post a Comment