The blow back on the drive to restrict guns has alerted the liberals at the LA Times. Here is their "alarming'" editorial on "Angry White men".
"They're not jihadists. They are white, right-wing Americans, nearly all with an obsessive attachment to guns, who may represent a greater danger to the lives of American civilians than international terrorists."
"Now that Obama is seriously pushing for tougher gun laws, further growth is a near certainty. The result? There's no knowing, but some kind of serious attack is increasingly possible."
What is increasingly possible is that Democrats will suffer in the next election. That is what the Times is concerned about.
"These groups should be closely monitored, with resources adequate to the task, even if it means shifting some homeland security money from the hunt for foreign terrorists."
Don't worry Times. Janet Napolitano is a step ahead of you.
Here are the latest results of the poll attached to this article:
Should we worry about "patriot" groups?
Yes
No
5% (279 votes)
95% (5,491 votes)
4 comments:
I guess Obama and the groups under him are preparing for the real terrorists mentioned in this op-ed. Big Sis has made sure that the Homeland Security folks have purchased 1.6 BILLION bullets of all sorts, including sniper rounds. The number of bullets would last for ten years in the U.S. Army. The number of bullets would account for over 5 bullets for every man, women and child in the U.S.
I am a white man who owns guns but is not angry (or at least not that I know of). Does that, or does it not, make me a domestic terrorist??
Elwood,
Look up in the sky; its a bird, its a plane, its a drone!
Squid
Most of those "No" votes are expressing contempt, not admiration. Who cares if a bunch of grown men run around in the woods playing cops and robbers?
Post a Comment