Hat tip Hot Air
Jim Moran, a Democratic congressman from Virginia (and total jerk) doesn't take kindly to critical questions from his audience. Such was the case when a woman asked him why he doesn't support "choice" for women who choose to defend themselves against violent attacks. Watch his arrogant and dismissive attitude.
http://hotair.com/archives/2013/03/12/woman-to-rep-moran-why-arent-you-pro-choice-on-self-defense-for-women/
Moran is a bully and a thug just like his son, who likes to engage in voter fraud for his dad and beat up women. I guess it runs in the family.
No wonder he didn't like the question.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
You can't even hear what Moran said, if he said anything of substance, because different factions in the audience are too loudly tossing remarks at each other.
It was an inane question, posed as a challenge rather than in search of an answer.
Its true there is a strong argument for women to be armed in self defense... read all about it in Restricting Handguns: The Liberal Skeptics Speak Out, with a forward by Senator Frank Church, of Idaho. (Nothing deters a carload of KKK like knowing their target is armed.)
I think among all the hub-bub, I heard the woman who posed the question offering the suggestion that if several people in the theater where "I am the joker" killed several people, had been armed, he might have been stopped.
It really doesn't make sense to me that several armed amateurs opening fire in a crowded darkened theater all at once would have resulted in fewer people being killed.
Now if someone right behind him happened to be close enough to put a bullet through the joker's head, that might have helped. But if a few people right behind him had grabbed his arms, his guns would have been rather useless.
And so much for the NRA standing up for protection of women:
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/18/us/facing-protective-orders-and-allowed-to-keep-guns.html?hp&_r=0
Post a Comment