"Hi, I'm Patrick Leahy, and I'm a horse's ass. I am also the guy who runs the Senate Judiciary Committee, making sure all the Democratic-appointed judges are swiftly approved and all the Republican-appointed judges are rejected.
If you are a horse's ass like me, you know how painful those nasty horse ticks can be. Whenever I get them, which is almost all the time, people think I've got a burr up my ass. Makes me hard to work with, if you know what I mean.
That's why I use Dr Fousesquawk's Horse Tick Powder. It's guaranteed to get fast results and kill those horse ticks on contact.
Hey, there goes one now.
Got' em.
See, all you gotta do is put a handful of Dr Fousesquawk's Horse Tick Powder in the palm of your hands and rub it into those sensitive, hard to reach spots real good. (Actually, I have to get one of my Senate pals like Harry Reid to do it for me. I'm a horse's ass, you know, so I can't do it myself.) Of course, I'm kinda worried that Harry may not be around much longer, so I need to find a replacement if he doesn't get re-elected. I kinda got my eye on that kid Alvin Greene from South Carolina. He looks like an up and comer.
How do you get Dr Fousesquawk's Horse Tick Powder? Easy. Just go to the Fousesquawk web site and start clickin' all those ads from Adsense. Keep clickin' until you find Dr Fousesquawk's Horse Tick Powder (It should come up after about an hour. He has a lotta sponsors, you know.) Fill in the form and bill it to your credit card (Each 1 pound can is 900 bucks-but it's worth it.)
So don't be a dumb horse's ass; be a happy horse's ass.
Send in for several cans of Dr Fousesquawk's Horse Tick Powder today. Your horse will thank you.
7 comments:
Cute way to up your take of the Google cash flow. Why don't you use this space to point out something useful, like the fact that Elena Kagan advocated that to be protected by the First Amendment, speech has to first be subjected to a balancing test to see if it serves some societal good? That was enough to motivate me to write both my senators (who both serve on the Judiciary Committee, about voting no, or at least questioning her closely on the point.
P.S. Condolences on your senate candidate. I would never vote for him, but he had some sincerity and integrity that the winner utterly lacks. At least he knew what he stood for and laid it out honestly.
Kagan said that?? What's the source?
TALK ABOUT A HORSE'S ASS! I figured you were either
Dick Cheney, Or GEORGY ,DESTROYED OUR GREAT
COUNTRY, BUSH!!!
I am appalled at the lack of intelligence, and I mean intelligence that people like you,HATE MONGERS, as yourself have!!
I thank GOD, that we have a senator who isn't afraid to tell the truth, that most of you "BONE HEADS" don't understand!!!
The Bush administration,In my opinion, used the presidency, to profit as much money as they could!
If you had a brain, you know the one that's obviously in "your ass", you would understand that Senator Leahy is trying to protect even your constitutional rights!!!!
I am old enough, and have watched enough, and STUDIED
Enough to realize how quickly, we are on a quick slip-slope
Of loosing this beautiful country to the foolish,hateful, deregulating asses like yourself! What are you 10 years old? We are in the worst recession of all time because of the greedy bastards on wall street, while constantly crying "DEREGULATION!,DEREGULATION!!! YOUR GEORGY
Gave all these people, who took,took,took from us the biggest tax cuts of all time, while morans, like yourself picked up the tab, for all of them! And your not even smart enough to figure it out!!! The oil companies got the biggest
Tax cuts of all time, while crying "DEREGULATION, and
Look at themes we have now, with the gulf disaster!
I figured you were from a southern state, who spends more time filled with hate, that you forget, WE ARE ALL AMERICANS!!!
I happen to know far more than you FOX listening to liars
do about how much of our freedom we have lost, due to the Bush administration,but I can't even tell you, because it is classified information!!!!
You truly don't know what the he'll you are talking about!,
But, I can promis you this! If you don't start paying more attention to the truth, IE , the so called patriot act, extra,
One of which Senator Leahy is trying to protect us from,
You are going to be a sorry ass, when the truth be told!,
The things I Know are shocking! And I mean shocking!
I cannot tell you about it, but I will say this when I hear
People and their concerns about the Feds reading their e-mail? I LAUGH, because they can watch you as you write
It!, THAT'S right! RIGHT OVER YOUR SHOULDER!!!
You sorry fool!!!!!
Sincerally, someone who knows a lot of classified information!!!!!!!
From the Why am I publishing this department:
I guess the reason I let this be posted is for the sake of humor. Here I put up a humerous post about Patrick Leahy, and what do I get? A comment that is twice as funny.
PS to Anonymous:
What the Hell are you doing up at 3:14 am reading my blog?????
I first ran across it in a comment at Front Porch Republic, on a post by Jeff Taylor about Kagan. I googled the quote to confirm from several sources that she actually wrote that in a submission to the Supreme Court on behalf of the government.
Now, it must be noted that a lawyer representing a client, even the government, has a duty to try any argument that will help their client win the case. She could beg off with the Alito excuse -- that stuff he wrote in the 1980s was just to make himself look good in a job application. Maybe its not what she really believes.
But, its enough to worry me.
P.S. I have to say I couldn't quite get the point of WHAT it is you don't like about Leahy -- name-calling without substantive criticism.
What I offered in the way of source was not up to the standards I usually demand of others, although it will provide some interesting reading to anyone who wants to look. Getting to the precise source:
http://supreme.justia.com/us/559/08-769/opinion.html
This is a case called "United States v. Stevens." It concerned a federal statute prohibiting distribution of images of animal cruelty. In the U.S. government's defense of the law, Kagan as cited in the court's opinion, asserted that a claim of categorical exclusion should be considered under a simple balancing test:
“Whether a given category of speech enjoys First Amendment protection depends upon a categorical balancing of the value of the speech against its societal costs.” Brief for United States 8; see also id., at 12.
Chief Justice Roberts, writing for a majority of the court, responded:
"As a free-floating test for First Amendment coverage, that sentence is startling and dangerous. The First Amendment’s guarantee of free speech does not extend only to categories of speech that survive an ad hoc balancing of relative social costs and benefits. The First Amendment itself reflects a judgment by the American people that the benefits of its restrictions on the Government outweigh the costs. Our Constitution forecloses any attempt to revise that judgment simply on the basis that some speech is not worth it."
Only Justice Alito dissented.
Post a Comment