In recent days, Mitt Romney has spoken at Duke and David Horowitz at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. This has resulted in an editorial by the Daily Tarheel, the campus paper at UNC. It maintains that campus speakers should be chosen "with discretion".
http://www.dailytarheel.com/article/2015/04/opinion-campus-speakers-should-be-chosen-with-discretion
Really? So Mitt Romney should not speak at Duke because he is partisan. Would the Daily Tarheel object to President Obama or Hillary Clinton speaking at Duke or UNC? Have they objected to Democratic politicians speaking on campus in the past. I doubt it.
And they object to David Horowitz expressing his right of free speech at UNC? The truth hurts, doesn't it? Would the Daily Tarheel object to speakers from the "other side" speaking on campus?
I note that just in February, both schools hosted a Malcolm X event in which Professor Sohail Daulatzai, my "good friend" from UC Irvine, was a panelist. This is a man who not only hates Israel, but also considers America to be a racist, imperialistic nation.
https://today.duke.edu/2015/02/malcomx
The Daily Tarheel is guilty of gross hypocrisy here.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment