Hat tip Jihad Watch, Allah's Willing Executioners, and Unzensuriert.
The news just keeps getting worse out of Kabul, where suicide bomber(s) at the airport set off bombs that have killed at least 13 people and wounded three American soldiers as American and allied forces attempt to get their people out of the country. Another bomb was set off at a Kabul hotel.
Meanwhile, in Austria, a country still reeling over the recent kidnapping, gang rape, and murder of a 13-year-old Austrian girl, in which 4 Afghan men are in custody, another Afghan sexual assault of a teenage girl has been reported. Three young Afghan men are being sought for the alleged sexual assault of a 15-year-old Austrian girl in Linz.
But it gets worse. The conservative Austrian blog, Unzensuriert, reports that Austria has taken in some 44,000 Afghan "refugees" as of 2020-second in Europe only to Angela Merkel's Germany! The below article by Unzensuriert is translated by Fousesquawk.
25 August 2021
Under Black-Green: Hardly any European country takes more Afghans than Austria
The current heated debate on the admission of Afghan "refugees" between the Austrian People Party and the Greens is on closer inspection, only a sham debate. According to statistics as of the year 2020, hardly any other county in Europe took in more Afghans, generally illegal migrants, as Austria. For the Muslims from the Far East, the borders have been wide open for months or actually years, as the daily "arrests", which are nothing more than admission registrations, show.
Only Germany admits more Afghans
Current statistics for the year 2020 show, where the 2.6 million Afghans who left their country migrated to. Among the front runners are the Muslim neighboring countries of Pakistan and Iran, who together, admitted 85% of the migrants (which corresponds to the Geneva Convention on Refugees, which defines the admission of refugees in the closest safe country). After that, European countries, follow, which are 5,000 kilometers away.
To date, 148,000 Afghans have come to Germany. In second place in Europe comes, surprisingly, the 10-times-smaller Austria with more than 44,000(!) Afghans. Surprising because while the rhetoric of the Austrian Peoples Party suggests that for months, it has been almost impossible for Afghans to get to Austria, and this should remain so. However, the numbers don't lie. And a reason for asylum, when we are generally talking about such a country surrounded by safe countries like Austria, for a good portion (40%) there is not even a benevolent consideration. According to the Geneva Convention, for Afghans, unless they jump in by parachute, there is no legitimate asylum in Austria.
But the black-green (and before that, red-black) politicians "successfully" got around that by obediently subordinating themselves to the demands of the EU and signing on to different provisions instead of representing Austrian interests. A limit as to how many migrants in Austria (there are already more than 2,000,000 Austrians of "migration background") has not yet been defined.
Germany, Sweden, and Austria as main "Flight" destinations
According to the UN- Refugee Agency (UNHCR), Austria, with its less than 9 million inhabitants, took in more Afghans than, for example, France, Great Britain, Italy, India, or Australia. Next to Germany and Sweden, Austria is, for Afghans, is one of the favorite destination countries in their "flight". What these guests will bring us besides costs and criminality, has not to now been comprehensibly defined.
In fact, about 100 illegal migrants a day, most from Arab areas, are walking the Austrian borders daily, especially in Burgenland, where they no longer know where to put them. And their number will continue to rise. Up to now the supposedly so "hard" on migration policy, Austrian Peoples Party, has not heard of the necessary suspension of asylum rights, given this situation.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fousesquawk comment: Why in the world are Western countries accepting all these thousands of people? As I have previously written, I acccept the responsibility of the US and other countries getting Afghans out of the country who worked with us even bringing them to our countries. Assuming they have already been vetted, we have a moral duty to help them. However, accepting any and all young Afghan men who show up unaccompanied at Europe's doorstep is a recipe for disaster. For them, they should be taken in-if at all- by neighboring safe countries like Pakistan and Iran, to say nothing of other Muslim countries in the Middle East. Where does the Geneva Convention say that "refugees" from places like Afghanistan Syria, Somalia, and other places have to be re-located in Western countries-far removed geographically from the nearest safe country? It doesn't. It says "nearest safe country".
How stupid can our leaders be?
No comments:
Post a Comment