Translate


Tuesday, December 16, 2025

The Intifada Is Globalized in Australia

 This article first appeared in New English Review.



According to the news coming out of Australia in the wake of yesterday’s massacre on Bondi Beach in Sydney, the Australian people are angry. They are fed up. They should be. Yet, as is all-too-often the case, their political leaders are never fed up. Presently, Australia has a prime minister, Anthony Albanese of the Labour Party, who seemingly doesn’t care if his people are fed up with Islamists, Jihadists, Jew haters, and people screaming, “Globalize the Intifada”. In September, his government recognized a Palestinian state, in effect, rewarding the atrocities of October 7, 2023. Australia, thus, joined other countries like Canada, Spain, and France who have followed the same naïve path in recent months. Did Albanese think that by placating the Palestinian lobby, Australian Jews and Australians in general would now be safe from Islamic terrorism?  Welcome to the real world, Mr. Albanese. Have we all not learned by now that rewarding Hamas and the Palestinians for their horrible massacre of October 7 goes against common sense? Have we not learned by now that the only thing these barbarians understand is strength and brute force?

Last September 7, that same Bondi Beach was the scene of a pro-Palestinian demonstration in which people were proclaiming the Holy Intifada, as pro-Hamas lunatics have been doing for years all over the world, including the US. I’ve heard it so many times  on campuses and on the streets that it’s ringing in my ears. It is nothing more than a call to kill Jews, around the world, “wherever you find them” as that 1400-year-old ditty goes. That is exactly what “Globalize the Intifada” means, and it played out yesterday in Sydney.

It is also playing out in New York, Paris, London, Vienna, Berlin, Stockholm, Malmo, Amsterdam, Rome, Brussels, and countless other places in the Western world. Places where Jews cannot go out in public wearing distinctive Jewish garb (also places where women don’t go at night no matter what they wear, but that’s a different story even though the perps are the same). If it is true that Australians are fed up, it is also true that Europeans are fed up. Canadians and Americans are also fed up.  Yet, with the exception of the US and Italy, their governments are not listening to them. The flow of new arrivals just keeps on coming. Crime and welfare costs keep rising, terrorist attacks keep happening (Europe is presently dealing with attacks and plans to attack their Christmas markets), Jews keep getting attacked, anti-Semitism has reached levels not seen since the 1930s, and our leaders wring their hands.

So now we have a Pakistani-born father and his son (born in Australia), who are so indignant about the plight of the Palestinians that they go out and kill 15 or so Jews who were simply celebrating Hannukah on a beach. When and where will this happen next in the Western world?

As I so often do after events like these, I repeat that we should not respond by attacking Muslims on the street or setting fire to their mosques.  Indeed, it appears that a Muslim street vendor in Sydney named Ahmed al-Ahmed actually grabbed one of the killers and disarmed him. The man is a hero, and I pay tribute to him. There have been differing accounts on the Web as to whether he is a Muslim or a Christian, but God forbid that he would have to suffer discrimination because of his religion or Middle Eastern appearance. I have no desire to write about Muslims what the notorious Jew-baiter of Nuremberg, Julius Streicher, wrote about Jews in his weekly, Der Stuermer. I admit, I am walking a fine line, but we cannot remain silent.

And that is the quandary we are faced with. We now have millions of Muslims in our Western countries, most of whom have done nothing (wherever their inner sympathies may lie). I wish them no harm, but in a certain respect they are becoming increasingly irrelevant to the discussion which we must have even if it hurts their sensibilities. The simple fact we must admit is that pure Islam is not compatible with Western values. While many, if not most Muslims may practice their religion peacefully and with tolerance, Islam is not a religion of peace and tolerance. It is anti-Christian and even more so anti-Jewish. And above all, it is violent. The fact that most Muslims are peaceful is irrelevant. The fact is that too many are not peaceful, too many are ticking time bombs, and too many are one mouse click away from becoming radicalized and joining the jihad.

We cannot continue to allow millions of Muslims to enter our countries and expect our innocent people to pay for it with their lives. This is exactly what is taking place in Western Europe more than anyplace else. Too many people are dying, and too many women are being raped. And it is all a result of their government’s mistaken migration and asylum policies, and our own political correctness. The term “Islamophobia” was coined a couple of decades ago by Islamists precisely for the purpose of silencing any criticism of Islam and its terrorist associations. It is time to laugh that word out of usage. Phobias are supposed to be irrational fears, not fears based on reason.

Whatever the proportion of the Muslim population in our respective countries is, that percentage must not be allowed to grow. If we have to put the brakes on all immigration (so as not to be discriminatory), so be it. The so-called asylum-seekers who do not have a valid claim should be sent home. The same goes for any foreigner (of any stripe, actually) who commits a crime in our countries.

We are not bigots, racists, or xenophobes. We are just fed up.

4 comments:

Lance C Johnson said...

I don't completely disagree with everything you wrote here, but I thought I'd just keep it simple and point out a couple of things you wrote and push back on them.

"That (kill all the Jews) is exactly what 'Globalize the Intifada' means, and it played out yesterday in Sydney."

"The term 'Islamophobia' was coined a couple of decades ago by Islamists precisely for the purpose of silencing any criticism of Islam and its terrorist associations."

My issue with both of these is that it implies that language is some sort of a fixed thing, and everybody means the exact same thing when they use a word or phrase. Surely a person who has written literal books about language knows better than that.

Clearly "globalize the infitada" means what you say to SOME people who use it. Others obviously mean something else. Now, if you were to say that this phrase should be abandoned because so many associate it with anti-Semitic extremism rather than merely criticism of Zionism and the Israeli government, then I would agree.

I also (somewhat) agree with you about the term Islamophobia. It definitely is used as a way to stop all conversation when it comes to analyzing the religion of Islam. However, it is a real thing.

For example, I know a lady who got all worried because a guy who "looked like an Iranian" was in the elevator with her at a hospital. Now, someone as well-read as you would point out that it's technically Iranianophobia (or something along those lines), we also both know that somebody that ignorant doesn't distinguish between Arabs, Iranians, Muslims, etc. For her, they're all pretty much part of the same group.

In this instance, I would say that she definitely has an irrational fear. (The guy was probably a doctor or nurse!) In this case, Islamophobia definitely fits.

I think it's potentially dangerous to say "This word means X and only X." That's just not the way language works.

Gary Fouse said...

Your points are well taken. Based on my own years of experience I know there are plenty of dopey kids in college who when they repeat the slogan are only thinking "Justice for the Palestinians" etc. But after Oct 7, you would think they would wake up. Not so, apparently. As for those who coined those phases, they know what it means to them. It is absolutely correct for our side to point out what it is really calling for. Australia demonstrates that.

As for Islamophobia (which is a tricky word to define), I agree that the woman on the elevator is being ignorant. Hell, my dermatologist is Iranian. Am I afraid of him? Her fear of every Muslim who gets on an elevator with her is irrational. Her fear of Islam and (many of ) its teachings is perfectly rational. I would say in Europe, that fear is even more rational given events there.
Speaking of Europe, how is your mom? I hope she is well.

Lance C Johnson said...

My mom passed away a few years ago. I got to see her a couple of times before she passed. I was supposed to go one more time with my wife and son but then Covid hit.

She was pretty miserable toward the end there (both physically and mentally). Obviously, I wasn't happy to learn that she passed, but I was relieved.

Thanks for asking.

Gary Fouse said...

I'm sorry to hear that.