It's called the "Democratic Ground Game", and it may already be starting in Ohio. If you think we don't need voter ID laws, read this report from Human Events.
http://www.humanevents.com/2012/10/26/is-voter-fraud-being-committed-in-ohio/
If this is true and it results in state and national elections being won, our democracy isn't worth a dime.
10 comments:
Wow. Nothing more reliable than unnamed sources.
There's this one guy who said that you shouldn't rely on unnamed sources though.
703,
Pls note that the title is in the form of a question and my concluding sentence says, "If this is true..."
But there is no reason to believe it might be true.
How about prior similar acts?
What prior similar acts?
(If its true, blame George W. Bush. His administration brought a particular Somali ethnic group here en masse, more or less for the same reasons Israel air-lifted the Ethiopian falashas en masse.)
"What prior similar acts"?
1960. All the dead folks in Chicago voted for Kennedy. That gave him Illinois and the election.
2000 Missouri. John Ashcroft lost the Senate when precincts in St Louis rushed the polls and they were forced to stay open-then close-then open. Ashcroft's lead disappeared.
Loretta Sanchez won her seat in Santa Ana, Ca allegedly when busloads of folks were brought up from Mexico to vote for her.
Gary, if you insist on promulgating lies within a week of when I re-explained for the third time, with documentation, that your understanding of the last 40 years is just plain inaccurate, how do you expect your allegations to be taken seriously?
The other two are allegations, and luridly speculative ones at that.
I do know, from working at the polls, that if someone gets in line before they close, the polls must stay open. On a day with long lines out the door, there could have been some momentary confusion, but people who arrived and got in line even five seconds before official closing time are entitled to vote.
And... don't make me laugh about shifting totals. Any "lead" Ashcroft might have had at that time would have been based perhaps 10 percent of the vote counted. No doubt totals see-sawed for several hours into the night. They always do.
I get it. People keep lying about things that happened, and when you keep lying, it becomes true.
Yes, Gary and Goebbels both practice that methodology, but I say without any sarcasm that Goebbels was deliberately engaged in evil for the thrill of it, while Gary sincerely believes that what he says must somehow be true, no matter what evidence may point the other way.
Agreed. I don't question Gary's motives, but I do question his methodology.
Post a Comment