White House is Hiding Visitor Logs

"I think it's time to burn those visitors logs, Davy."


Hat tip to Politico

The "most transparent administration in history" is appealing a judge's ruling that Secret Service visitor logs for the White House are subject to a Freedom of Information request. (That would seem obvious.)


http://www.politico.com/blogs/joshgerstein/1011/Obama_administration_appeals_ruling_on_White_House_visitor_logs.html


What is it the White House wishes to hide? Could it be the presence of radical figures who have visited the White House-especially in the wake of scandals like Solyndra? I remember when they made a big deal out of posting the visitors logs on their own. They even inserted a few names designed to get the conservative blogs to erroneously report that people like Bill Ayers were visiting the White House. Cute trick. Now they don't want to release the names?

I'll get to the bottom of this; I will send a note to my White House pals at Attack Watch and get the straight skinny.

No sooner said than done. Here is my message:

"Politico reports that the White House is appealing a judges ruling that White House vistors logs are subject to FOIA requests. I know the White House previously released lists. Why are you fighting this? Pam Geller says you don't want the public to know who is visiting the White House."

I'll let you know as soon as I get my response. Stay tuned.