The Democrats are all over Rand Paul since he announced his candidacy for president. The "big issue" is his two recent interviews with NBC's Savannah Guthrie and Kelly Evans of CNBC in which he came across as overbearing to his female interviewers.
That may be fair criticism, but when MSNBC's ED SCHULTZ takes on the role of the knight in shining armor accusing Paul of having a problem with women, that is a bit too much.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2015/04/09/ed_schultz_rand_paul_has_history_of_talking_down_to_women_in_television.html
Is this the same Ed Schultz who was suspended by MSNBC when he (repeatedly) referred to conservative commentator Laura Ingraham as a "right-wing slut" during a radio broadcast?
Yes, it is.
Ed, if you want to go after Rand Paul, make fun of his hair or his dad, knock yourself out. But when it comes to women, you need to shut up.
I voted for his dad once, but Rand seems to be a bit of a lying politician by comparison. I might vote for him over Hillary, but I'm not sure I could vote for either. Depends on what he has to say for himself over the next couple of years. (If its Rand Paul v. Scott Walker, and no democrat worth thinking about, that choice would be a slam dunk as far as I'm concerned.)
ReplyDeleteI would not vote for his Dad. There are some things I like about Rand, but still some things that give me pause.
ReplyDelete