Jim Moran
"That's my boy."
Congressman Jim Moran (D-VA) is one of the most obnoxious characters in Congress. He has been featured on this blog on several occasions. Now James O'Keefe's Project Veritas has struck again. An undercover reporter paid a visit to Moran's campaign manager in Arlington, Virginia, who just happens to be Moran's son, Patrick. The video below is a conversation between the two discussing casting fraudulent votes. I am cross-posting this from Atlas Shrugs.
http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2012/10/video-democrat-congressman-jim-morans-son-caught-red-handed-in-voter-fraud.html
Of course, groups like the NAACP and ACLU are not concerned about things like this. They are only concerned with efforts to stop it. Make no mistake; in a crucial swing state where the tally is close, this kind of activity can swing the election. This is precisely what groups like ACORN have become notorious for. Remember how dead people in Chicago swung Illinois and the election to Kennedy in 1960? Remember that Al Franken Senate victory in Minnesota? I have no doubt that the Democrats are gearing up to do this very thing in those crucial battleground states.
You just saw proof.
I received a "Voter ID" card for my mother who passed away 20 years ago. She lived in Florida and was a Democrat so I don't think they audit their rolls very well... if they are Democrats.
ReplyDeleteI think I wrote here before that she would probably received two IDs to vote had she been a felon.
I think the single most important function ACORN does is voter fraud. That's why the Dems created it.
Gary, you blew your credibility when you repeated that silly story about Illinois in 1960. It just proves you are willing to KNOWINGLY lie to make your point.
ReplyDeleteI've reminded you several times, the Republican Party PAID FOR A RECOUNT and dropped it when they realized it wasn't going to swing enough votes to get Nixon the state's electoral votes. (Daley didn't care about Kennedy -- all the fraud was in defeating State's Attorney Ben Adamowski. But he didn't have the deep pockets to pay for the recall. Wholesale fraud like that isn't done by sneaking in voters with phony ID. It's done by "thin pencil Louie" writing down whatever he wants the totals to be).
As for this video... the idea was entirely that of the "interviewer." The interviewee was steering him to more wholesome methods, but of course the plant was pushing his own agenda.
Utility bills are not easy to fake. I ought to know. I've examined quite a few for same day registration. To look genuine, they have to BE genuine.
(Miggie, please, don't you know past tense from future tense?)
My understanding for the past 40 or so years was that Nixon rejected the challenge because he didn't want to divide the country (like Gore did). Don't laugh.
ReplyDeleteI don't need to laugh Gary, it simply isn't true. I've given you a published source every time I've reminded you:
ReplyDeleteRoyko, Mike. BOSS: Richard J. Daley of Chicago, 1971 (3rd printing), 119.
"Nixon gained very little in the nine hundred precincts, showing clearly that the Machine was more concerned with beating Adamowski than electing Kennedy. With nothing to gain for Nixon, the Republicans lost interest, leaving Adamowski with the cost of the recheck -- more than $600 a day. He didn't have the money, so he had to give it up."
As I've mentioned before, it is instructive that when actual ballots were counted, there were ten thousand more votes in those 900 precincts for Adamowski -- and he had only lost in the offical count by 25,000. Its the COUNT in the individual precincts that was rigged.
When someone wants to steal an election, that's how its done... not by infiltrating a few impersonators. Hell, that would be real WORK. Think of the logistics of the phony operation this dime-store Woodward insinuated. Its just ludicrous.