Saturday, April 7, 2012

Fast and Furious-Now the White House is Stonewalling

Hat tip to Daily Caller

For quite some time, it has been clear that the Department of Justice has been stonewalling the House and Senate probe of the ATF's Operation Fast and Furious. I have been saying all along that the idea for this operation had to have come from the highest levels of the DOJ-if not the White House itself. Now we have a case of the White House stonewalling Congress. They won't let Kevin O'Reilly come forth and testify-even though he is willing to do so. O'Reilly is the White House official who was discussing Fast and Furious on a regular basis with ATF Phoenix agent in charge William Newell.

http://dailycaller.com/2012/04/06/chaffetz-white-house-blocking-access-to-fast-and-furious-witness-who-wants-to-testify/

Why won't the White House let O'Reilly testify?

7 comments:

  1. Hmmmmmmm again. Looks like the
    e-mails which the committee(s) have do not comport with the White House Counsel letter. Since the e-mails came first, they are probably more accurate and the letter less so (another way of saying the letter is yet another lie). Wonder how many shredders have been burned out at DOJ and the White House, and how many forests wasted.

    I do not believe it is possible to destroy/delete everything (it seldom if ever is). I keep waiting, or at least hoping, for someone to get his heuvos in such a vise that it is less painful to cop out than to continue to stonewall. May never happen, but it could, and while it may be wishful thinking, I believe it eventually will.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Why should who what??

    ReplyDelete
  3. Why should the White House take notice of a grandstanding propaganda exercise by Darrell Issa?

    ReplyDelete
  4. The White House probably won't, but some mope who is about to head off to the penitentiary might.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Jail house snitches will say anything. But this little tempest in a tea party won't generate any.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Siarlys--unfortunately, you are most likely correct this time.

    ReplyDelete