Our part-time president (Barack Obama) has embarked on yet another grand campaign tour trying to push for his Job Bill while his followers continue their occupy Wall Street, LA and everywhere else.
Yes, I said "his followers".
Why else do you think these thousands of loafers would take to the streets condemning Wall Street, corporations, banks and anyone producing and making money-without criticizing the president or making a peep about what should be the poster child of their protests-Solyndra?
That's because they are doing Obama's bidding. While the Activist-in-Chief talks aimlessly about jobs, jobs, jobs, those who want to bring down the capitalist system are doing his dirty work. They know that he shares their condemnation of capitalism, the free market system and just about everything else that made us the richest nation on earth. They know he wants to crack down on Wall Street as much as they do. They also know that Wall Street is no longer on Obama's side.
Why do you think Obama has not called upon these loons to call it a day and go home? They have made their point. Instead, he "empathizes" with them and refers to his desire to do what's right for the "99% of the American people."
This is all part of the Obama reelection campaign. This is the leftist answer to the Tea Party.
Some answer.
Here is my prediction: Just like Solyndra and just like Fast and Furious, we are going to eventually connect the dots and learn that there is a connection between Occupy Wall Street and the White House. Maybe that's why the White House is fighting the release of their visitor logs.
Write it down. You heard it here first.
(I think,)
First Gary lays out how the mere existence of the OWS discredits the Democratic Party, then he claims the whole thing was CONCEIVED as part of the campaign to re-elect President Obama. The split in your personality is showing Gary. Make up your mind.
ReplyDeleteFrom what scattering of quotes has appeared in the news, people occupying Wall Street sound quite disenchanted with Obama -- and rightly so as far as it goes. He should have taken a harder line on Wall Street in the first place, rather than being entranced that he was getting more Wall Street money than the Republicans in 2008.
David Brooks noted that the Republicans were in really sad shape when that happened. But it didn't mean that Wall Street was either permanently married to Obama's program, or had turned over a new leaf and cared more for the prosperity of the American people than for their own multi-million dollar bonuses.
If anyone needs to know about the "Activist and Chief", read "Radical and Chief" by Stanley Kurtz. Prepare yourself for an education on this master of deceit, deception and dishonesty. Does the "Occupy" everyhting movement have a connection to the White House? One does not have to go further than David Axelrod, Obama,s clever re-elect maven. Axelrod is using every Alinsky technique to vilify the rich, Republicans and Wall Street. This action deflects from Obama's failure as a President. Obama is a failure in the economy, the bailout, unifying America, international relations, transparency, respect for America and national security. The Occupy Wall Street effort is backed by Communists, Soecialists, Marxists, Democrates, the useless loafers of America who require entitlements.
ReplyDeleteWlss Street is not the problem. the problem is ACORN, SEIU, Union thugs, and far-left Congress memebers who allowed the Commnity Organizers to push the CRA, bad loans, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac gaurantees on loans to those individuals who should not be shopping for homes. This led to a the manufacturing of an economic collapse, ala Cloward and Piven strategy.
Squid
Squid, anything you recommend as an "education" should be encased in a large salt crystal before reading. There was a neo-Nazi named Stormer who wrote a book called "None Dare Call It Treason" that we used to read for laughs in 9th grade U.S. Government class back in 1969. This sounds like more of the same D-grade material.
ReplyDelete