Sunday, December 28, 2008
Hitler-Hollywood's Enigma
Mussolini and Hitler
"Hey Benito, do ya think Juventus will beat Inter tommorrow?"
As a follow-up to my posting on the "Valkyrie" movie, I thought I would jot down a few thoughts on a topic that has puzzled me for decades-that of Adolf Hitler himself. As an amateur scholar of the Third Reich, I have read extensively about Hitler and know quite a bit about the details of his life. Several years ago, I came to the opinion that he was probably the most-photographed man in history. Since he lived in the era after photography was invented and is generally considered (rightfully in my view) as the most evil figure in world history to date, I am probably correct in that opinion.
Yet, it seems to me that in all the movies about Nazi Germany, few if any seem to be able to accurately portray this man beyond the obvious evil. I guess the closest I have seen is the German movie, "Downfall", which is based on the autobiography of Traudl Junge, one of Hitler's secretaries, who was present in the Berlin bunker in the final days. Most, if not all movies only seem to be able to bring out the brooding (as in "Valkyrie") or the rages of temper that he was famous for. In addition, since Hitler's visage is known to all, it is also a challenge to dress up an actor who truly looks like the dictator himself, let alone capture his personality.
I think one problem is that for all the photographs, the film clips and newsreels of his speeches, there is precious little that captures Hitler in any recorded conversation. Film clips of him greeting people or discussing anything are invariably silent. There is almost nothing available that shows him in everyday conversation with people in which we can listen to a soundtrack.
Today, we have the advantage of sit-down interviews with journalists that are recorded live on TV where we can get a sense of the politician's personality or character. Think of any recent American president. With our politicians, we have an opportunity to form an impression of the person's personality for better or worse. We don't have that with Hitler. Perhaps, there is something like that buried deep in the German National Archives, who knows?.
What we have are eyewitness accounts of his contemporaries, those who knew him and worked for him. Many of these accounts describe a man who could be kind and considerate to the lowly servants or secretaries who worked under him. (Apparently, most of his rages were reserved for his generals or other Nazi officials.) Of course, any movie producer has to deal carefully showing anything positive about his personality for fear of appearing to try to show him in a positive light.
So it seems to me that Hollywood-and perhaps even German filmmakers-have little to work with. The result is that we see this man uniformly portrayed as angry or brooding 24-7. Of course, this is in perfect conformity with history's judgement of Hitler as the quintessential evil madman, which he clearly was. However, if we had more than just the silent film clips and recorded speeches, would we have a better insight into the man and what made him tick?
Gary,
ReplyDeleteHave you ever seen the movie "Max"
http://www.moviehabit.com/reviews/max_b703.shtml
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_(film)
I'd like to know what you think of it - we found it to be a very different point of view from any other "Hitler" film we'd ever seen.
Linnea
One thing that I really liked about the movie Downfall is that it wasn't afraid to portray Hitler as a human being. Because that's the thing that we have to keep in mind. If we simply view him as a monster, then we will never truly understand how a person can become that way. (And in my opinion, when we view him as a human being, it makes him far scarier than if we dismiss him as a monster.
ReplyDeleteIf you own the movie on DVD, I highly recommend the bonus features. They interview the actor who played him, and he had some pretty interesting things to say. He took on the challenge of playing him as a man and not as a charicature, which would have to be difficult to do.
Linnea,
ReplyDeleteI know of the movie, but I have not seen it.
Lance,
ReplyDeleteI agree with you. It was probably the most realistic. Traudl Junge reported that he was quite decent to his secretarial pool.
Persdonally, having studied his life, I think what turned him bad was his years living in Vienna as a young man, when he was often penniless and living in men's shelters. I also think that it was this period that turned him into an anti-Semite. In Mein Kampf, if I recall, it was in these years that he started forming negative ideas about Jews.
Actually the technology is available and has been used to restore the voice to many of his movies. I saw a few of them on the History Channel a couple of months ago.
ReplyDeleteThe technology was developed to help the deaf lipread and is being used on other "silent" movies.
Findalis,
ReplyDeleteI saw something similar also, perhaps on the History Channel. He was meeting with a foreign leader somewhere, and an aide to the leader secretely recorded the conversation. That's about the only one I have heard.
Now it is being used or trying to be used on silent movies, other historical films, etc...
ReplyDeleteDeaf people have been telling us for years what was really being said on the films, now we are finding out that they were telling the truth.
I sure hope by "silent films" you're just referring to documentaries and you don't mean adding sound to Chaplin and Buster Keaton movies! That's like colorizing Casablanca! (In other words, an abomination.)
ReplyDelete