Translate


Monday, May 30, 2011

Protest at DePaul University



Campus Watch and Red Eye are reporting on a protest this week at DePaul University because a handful of teachers were denied tenure. This is an example of how the politics of racial identity is alive and well on university campuses. Get your hankerchiefs out. You'll need them.

http://neighborhoods.redeyechicago.com/lincoln-park/trending-topic/2011/05/27/protesters-rally-against-depauls-tenure-woes/

BY Jeremy Mikula, DePaul reporter · Friday, May 27, 2011 9:00 a.m.


A group of about 65 students, faculty members and graduate students gathered outside DePaul’s Student Center Thursday afternoon to protest what they think is a glaring denial of tenure to minority and female candidates.

“This rally is to increase awareness because of the fact that those people affected are people of color and/or women,” said Brian Bean, 30, a member of the International Socialist Organization who helped organize the rally. “It stinks of racism and sexism, as well of academic freedom.”



DePaul’s tenure-bestowing process has been met with criticism in recent years.

Norman Finkelstein, a professor in the political science department, found himself at the center of controversy when he was denied tenure in 2007, likely because of his radical views on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the Holocaust. Last year, five professors were denied tenure – four of them were women, and one was a minority man. This academic year, of the more than 40 professors who applied for tenure, six were denied, all of them minorities.


(Fousesquawk comment: Finkelstein was canned because of his crackpot scholarship, which was an embarrassment to the university.)

DePaul has denied any kind of wrongdoing in its tenure denial. DePaul president Rev. Dennis H. Holtschneider, was quoted in a New York Times article as saying, “This has never happened before at DePaul. People didn’t notice it in the early stages of the tenure process. … Then we realized, ‘Oh, my gosh, all the candidates getting the no votes are people of color.’ ”

Protesters, however, disagree with Holtschneider’s assessment, saying this is more than just an accident.

For example, Melissa Bradshaw, a professor of women’s and gender studies who spoke at the rally, was denied tenure last year. She had founded a minor in LGBTQ studies, unique for a Catholic university.

(Fousesquawk comment: (LGBTQ) stands for Lesbian, Gay, Bi-Sexual, Transgender and Queer or Questioning, I'm not sure which. Imagine a university having a minor program in this field.)

Quinetta Shelby, the only African-American in the chemistry department, was denied tenure this year. The department unanimously voted against recommending tenure for Shelby because they did not respect three of the journals in which she published – journals in which others granted tenure had work published.



Protestor’s signs said things like “Holtschneider did WHAT?!?!” and “SHAM(E),” and there were shouts of “Our education is under attack. What do we do? Fight to get it back.”




One of the speakers at the rally, Namita Goswami, was denied tenure this academic year. Goswami was a professor in the philosophy department who taught post-colonialism and feminist philosophy.

Post colonial is code word for everything in the third world is good and noble. Everything connected with western civilization is bad.

“I was hired specifically to challenge the views of traditional philosophy,” Goswami said. “Our students and their families make enormous sacrifices for a DePaul education. To honor such sacrifices, I believe it is incumbent on all parts of the university to consider appeals of morality and diversity with seriousness. I believe, in the injustice of my denial, that it constitutes an academic freedom violation.”


This sounds like a case for Gloria Allred.
"My client is a VICTIM!"

A report done by the American Association of University Professors highlighted hostility among the department toward Goswami. Noted in the AAUP report were by opinions that her strongest published work was an essay “co-authored with her husband” and that she suffers not from a “writing problem,” but from “a thinking problem” – things protesters say are evidence of sexism and racism.

Fousesquawk comment: That's funny. That's what I always say about Finkelstein. Besides, the AAUP is a left-wing bunch headed by left-wing guy Cary Nelson.

Goswami, originally from India, was hired in 2003 and received the highest teaching award given out by the university: the College of Liberal Arts and Sciences Excellence in Teaching Award.

An internal review board examining her appeal found that her academic freedom had been violated — the first time it had been officially found in the university’s history. An independent review also reached the conclusion that Goswami was wrongfully denied tenure.

Despite these findings, the final say on tenure rests with Holtschneider as university president. By rule, the tenure process begins with department vote, then academic-college vote, and finally with the University Board on Promotion and Tenure. Once denied tenure, professors are no longer allowed to work at the university full-time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Here's the problem. As you can see from the article, DePaul, like most universities, is wasting resources teaching fields like post-colonialism, gender studies, gay studies and other topics which will prove useless for graduates unless they want to teach them as future professors. I refuse to believe that universities are choosing to cull minority teachers from their ranks. On the contrary, they are trying hard to increase the numbers of minority faculty. This protest smacks of racial and gender politics, which is alive and well in academia.

Final point. Academia is almost completely dominated by liberals. If somebody is, indeed, guilty of racism, sexism, or what-have-you, this cannot be blamed on conservatives.

Prediction: Watch Holtschneider cave in.

7 comments:

Siarlys Jenkins said...

Of course this kind of decision cannot be properly evaluated either on the picket line OR in the blogsphere. I would generally oppose tenure for anyone offering LGBTGQWERTYUIOP studies. Ditto for "alternative philosophy." A competent professor should be able to teach the entire history of philosophy, then offer some views on what, if anything, might be added to it (that's where her own "alternatives" can come in), then challenge the students to offer some applications of their own, and explain why.

When two years in a row, 4 or 6 out of 30 or 40 candidates, denied tenure, are ALL women or minorities, I would take a second look. It is best to rule out bias by a thorough, objective second review. Of course, if 5 or 6 of those who GOT tenure are ALSO women and minorities (the biases are not the same and should be examined separately), the complaint is weaker.

I have doubts about the denial of the chemistry professor. If the best the committee could come up with is that they don't respect the journals she published in, that's pretty lame. What about the value of the content of her publishing. Further, more attention should be paid to how well she imparts chemistry to her students -- publishing is overvalued. Maybe she deserves tenure, maybe not.

Common sense would say, when the decision is announced, if something seems wrong, people who believe that should say so. Then a second, qualified, committee should take a second look, based on the data. Then, they should carefully explain their reasons. That should be about the end of it.

Gary Fouse said...

Siarlys,

Why don't you make that 2 hour drive to Chicago and straighten them all out?

Siarlys Jenkins said...

Sure, I'll tell them "Gary Fouse sent me." Then they'll listen up.

You thought this was worth posting. You haven't tried to do anything to straighten them out, you just ran your mouth about it. So, I responded. You should be flattered someone was paying attention.

But tell you what... I'm looking up contact information at the school's web site. I'll leave a message telling them to check out the Fousesquawk page and follow the advice provided by Siarlys Jenkins. Will that do?

Gary Fouse said...

Sure Siarlys, Anything to get a few more clicks. Maybe they'll even write a letter of complaint to UCi about me.

Seriously, the reason I write about is simply so the public will be aware of the insanity that goes on on campuses-at least in the Humanities.

Siarlys Jenkins said...

And that's why I respond... because there is a great deal of insanity. If we're going to talk about it at all, its good to talk about what they SHOULD be doing.

Also, if, as is possible from the information you presented, it is possible that SOME of the protests have SOME rational basis, then it is good to point out how a more coherent and reasonable examination could sort out what is valid from what is not, and set things somewhere close to right.

Anonymous said...

Your understanding of postcolonial studies is far, far beyond ignorant.

Anonymous said...

Your understanding of postcolonial studies is far, far beyond ignorant.